TRET.DE vs. REET
TRET.DE (VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF) and REET (iShares Global REIT ETF) are both REIT funds - TRET.DE tracks the GPR Global 100 while REET tracks the FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Global REIT Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, TRET.DE returned 3.83%/yr vs 3.95%/yr for REET. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TRET.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for REET.
Performance
TRET.DE vs. REET - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
TRET.DE is traded in EUR, while REET is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the REET values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TRET.DE achieves a 10.95% return, which is significantly lower than REET's 16.58% return.
TRET.DE
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 2.40%
- YTD
- 10.95%
- 6M
- 12.17%
- 1Y
- 16.39%
- 3Y*
- 11.07%
- 5Y*
- 3.83%
- 10Y*
- —
REET
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 3.80%
- YTD
- 16.58%
- 6M
- 16.66%
- 1Y
- 20.42%
- 3Y*
- 9.74%
- 5Y*
- 3.95%
- 10Y*
- 4.25%
TRET.DE vs. REET - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRET.DE VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF | 10.95% | 1.89% | 6.86% | 9.92% | -21.30% | 40.74% | -15.21% | 22.16% | -5.49% |
REET iShares Global REIT ETF | 16.58% | -4.84% | 9.42% | 6.97% | -19.40% | 42.34% | -17.86% | 27.23% | -7.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between TRET.DE and REET is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2018 | 0.61 |
The correlation between TRET.DE and REET has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TRET.DE vs. REET — Risk / Return Rank
TRET.DE
REET
TRET.DE vs. REET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (TRET.DE) and iShares Global REIT ETF (REET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TRET.DE | REET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.32 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.95 | 2.76 | -0.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.51 | 8.89 | -2.37 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TRET.DE vs. REET - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRET.DE drawdown since its inception was -41.74%, smaller than the maximum REET drawdown of -44.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRET.DE and REET.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRET.DE | REET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.74% | -44.24% | +2.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.37% | -7.44% | -0.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.60% | -19.45% | +0.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.36% | -28.89% | -1.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.24% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.09% | -10.51% | -1.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.51% | 2.30% | +0.21% |
Volatility
TRET.DE vs. REET - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (TRET.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.39% compared to iShares Global REIT ETF (REET) at 4.18%. This indicates that TRET.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than REET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TRET.DE | REET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.39% | 4.18% | +0.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.74% | 8.87% | +0.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.10% | 11.78% | +0.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.22% | 15.95% | -0.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.83% | 18.61% | -0.78% |
TRET.DE vs. REET - Expense Ratio Comparison
TRET.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than REET's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
TRET.DE vs. REET - Dividend Comparison
TRET.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.31%, which matches REET's 3.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
REET iShares Global REIT ETF | 3.34% | 3.67% | 3.64% | 3.27% | 2.43% | 3.18% | 2.65% | 5.25% | 5.73% | 3.84% | 5.37% | 3.56% |
TRET.DE VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF | 3.31% | 3.66% | 3.44% | 3.66% | 4.69% | 1.78% | 4.45% | 3.31% | 1.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TRET.DE and REET have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, REET is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
REET is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for TRET.DE.
TRET.DE tracks GPR Global 100, while REET tracks FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Global REIT Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for TRET.DE and 0.14% for REET.
Find the right allocation for TRET.DE and REET
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer