TREG.L vs. AREG.L
TREG.L (VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF) and AREG.L (abrdn Future Real Estate UCITS ETF) are both REIT funds. TREG.L is passively managed, while AREG.L is actively managed. Over the past year, TREG.L returned 10.15% vs 8.87% for AREG.L. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TREG.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for AREG.L.
Performance
TREG.L vs. AREG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
TREG.L is traded in GBP, while AREG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the AREG.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TREG.L achieves a 2.95% return, which is significantly lower than AREG.L's 4.94% return.
TREG.L
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- -3.10%
- YTD
- 2.95%
- 6M
- 1.90%
- 1Y
- 10.15%
- 3Y*
- 7.67%
- 5Y*
- 3.19%
- 10Y*
- —
AREG.L
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- -1.99%
- YTD
- 4.94%
- 6M
- 4.49%
- 1Y
- 8.87%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TREG.L vs. AREG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
TREG.L VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF | 2.95% | 6.62% | 6.94% |
AREG.L abrdn Future Real Estate UCITS ETF | 4.94% | 0.47% | 4.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between TREG.L and AREG.L is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2024 | 0.95 |
The correlation between TREG.L and AREG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TREG.L vs. AREG.L — Risk / Return Rank
TREG.L
AREG.L
TREG.L vs. AREG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (TREG.L) and abrdn Future Real Estate UCITS ETF (AREG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TREG.L | AREG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.14 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.08 | 0.93 | +0.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.50 | 2.91 | +0.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TREG.L | AREG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 | 0.78 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 0.37 | -0.14 |
Drawdowns
TREG.L vs. AREG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TREG.L drawdown since its inception was -35.66%, which is greater than AREG.L's maximum drawdown of -18.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TREG.L and AREG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TREG.L | AREG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.66% | -18.47% | -17.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.39% | -9.54% | +0.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.30% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.89% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.88% | -5.08% | -1.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.40% | -5.60% | -4.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.89% | 3.04% | -0.15% |
Volatility
TREG.L vs. AREG.L - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (TREG.L) and abrdn Future Real Estate UCITS ETF (AREG.L) have volatilities of 3.46% and 3.45%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TREG.L | AREG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.46% | 3.45% | +0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.15% | 9.16% | -0.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.40% | 11.37% | +0.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.66% | 12.41% | +2.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.97% | 12.41% | +4.56% |
TREG.L vs. AREG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
TREG.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than AREG.L's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
TREG.L vs. AREG.L - Dividend Comparison
TREG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.43%, while AREG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AREG.L abrdn Future Real Estate UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TREG.L VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF | 3.43% | 3.57% | 3.48% | 3.64% | 4.54% | 1.82% | 4.49% | 3.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, TREG.L and AREG.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, TREG.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TREG.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for AREG.L.
They also come from different issuers: VanEck and abrdn. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for TREG.L and 0.40% for AREG.L.
Find the right allocation for TREG.L and AREG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer