PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AREG.L vs. DPYA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

AREG.L vs. DPYA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in abrdn Future Real Estate UCITS ETF (AREG.L) and iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (DPYA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

AREG.L vs. DPYA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


Different Trading Currencies

AREG.L is traded in GBp, while DPYA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the DPYA.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AREG.L achieves a 1.50% return, which is significantly lower than DPYA.L's 2.17% return.


AREG.L

1D
-0.08%
1M
-8.20%
YTD
1.50%
6M
1.42%
1Y
3.72%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DPYA.L

1D
-0.24%
1M
-7.39%
YTD
2.17%
6M
1.96%
1Y
4.42%
3Y*
3.91%
5Y*
2.19%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AREG.L vs. DPYA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

AREG.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than DPYA.L's 0.59% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

AREG.L vs. DPYA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AREG.L
AREG.L Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
AREG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AREG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
AREG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
AREG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
AREG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

DPYA.L
DPYA.L Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
DPYA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DPYA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
DPYA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
DPYA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
DPYA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AREG.L vs. DPYA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Future Real Estate UCITS ETF (AREG.L) and iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (DPYA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AREG.LDPYA.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.27

0.31

-0.03

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.46

0.50

-0.04

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.07

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.35

0.41

-0.06

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.17

1.43

-0.26

AREG.L vs. DPYA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AREG.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.27, which is comparable to the DPYA.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AREG.L and DPYA.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AREG.LDPYA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

0.31

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

0.16

+0.10

Correlation

The correlation between AREG.L and DPYA.L is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

AREG.L vs. DPYA.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither AREG.L nor DPYA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

AREG.L vs. DPYA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AREG.L drawdown since its inception was -18.47%, smaller than the maximum DPYA.L drawdown of -36.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AREG.L and DPYA.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


AREG.LDPYA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.47%

-42.96%

+24.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.24%

-11.39%

+1.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.20%

-9.67%

+1.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.73%

-12.59%

+6.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.96%

2.93%

+0.03%

Volatility

AREG.L vs. DPYA.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for abrdn Future Real Estate UCITS ETF (AREG.L) is 4.73%, while iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (DPYA.L) has a volatility of 5.33%. This indicates that AREG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DPYA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


AREG.LDPYA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.73%

5.33%

-0.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.57%

8.95%

-0.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.55%

14.36%

-0.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.41%

14.97%

-2.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.41%

17.06%

-4.65%