PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AREG.L vs. XDER.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

AREG.L vs. XDER.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in abrdn Future Real Estate UCITS ETF (AREG.L) and Xtrackers FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Europe Real Estate UCITS ETF 1C (XDER.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

AREG.L vs. XDER.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AREG.L achieves a 2.37% return, which is significantly higher than XDER.L's -1.89% return.


AREG.L

1D
0.86%
1M
-6.69%
YTD
2.37%
6M
1.71%
1Y
4.35%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XDER.L

1D
2.63%
1M
-10.17%
YTD
-1.89%
6M
-0.36%
1Y
8.46%
3Y*
6.66%
5Y*
-2.59%
10Y*
0.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AREG.L vs. XDER.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

AREG.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than XDER.L's 0.33% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

AREG.L vs. XDER.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AREG.L
AREG.L Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
AREG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AREG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
AREG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
AREG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
AREG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

XDER.L
XDER.L Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
XDER.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDER.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDER.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
XDER.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDER.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AREG.L vs. XDER.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Future Real Estate UCITS ETF (AREG.L) and Xtrackers FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Europe Real Estate UCITS ETF 1C (XDER.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AREG.LXDER.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.32

0.51

-0.19

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.52

0.80

-0.28

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.11

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.49

0.55

-0.07

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.65

1.98

-0.33

AREG.L vs. XDER.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AREG.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.32, which is lower than the XDER.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AREG.L and XDER.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AREG.LXDER.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

0.51

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.31

-0.01

Correlation

The correlation between AREG.L and XDER.L is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

AREG.L vs. XDER.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither AREG.L nor XDER.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

AREG.L vs. XDER.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AREG.L drawdown since its inception was -18.47%, smaller than the maximum XDER.L drawdown of -45.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AREG.L and XDER.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


AREG.LXDER.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.47%

-45.20%

+26.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.99%

-16.58%

+6.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.41%

-27.11%

+19.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.74%

-13.21%

+7.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.81%

4.64%

-1.83%

Volatility

AREG.L vs. XDER.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for abrdn Future Real Estate UCITS ETF (AREG.L) is 4.67%, while Xtrackers FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Europe Real Estate UCITS ETF 1C (XDER.L) has a volatility of 7.44%. This indicates that AREG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDER.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


AREG.LXDER.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.67%

7.44%

-2.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.60%

11.65%

-3.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.56%

16.51%

-2.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.41%

20.92%

-8.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.41%

18.68%

-6.27%