TRBF vs. DBND
TRBF (Angel Oak Total Return ETF) and DBND (DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. TRBF is actively managed, while DBND is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.82 means they have usually moved in the same direction. TRBF charges 0.44%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for DBND.
Performance
TRBF vs. DBND - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TRBF achieves a -0.10% return, which is significantly higher than DBND's -0.89% return.
TRBF
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- -1.13%
- 6M
- -0.50%
- YTD
- -0.10%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
DBND
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- -1.01%
- 6M
- -1.26%
- YTD
- -0.89%
- 1Y
- 1.72%
- 3Y*
- 4.43%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 2.17%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $3.03M | $2.95M | $3.32M | |
| $289.91K | $447.70K | $231.20K |
TRBF vs. DBND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TRBF Angel Oak Total Return ETF | -0.10% | 0.94% |
DBND DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF | -0.89% | 1.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between TRBF and DBND is 0.82, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2025 | 0.82 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TRBF vs. DBND — Risk / Return Rank
TRBF
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DBND
TRBF vs. DBND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Angel Oak Total Return ETF (TRBF) and DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF (DBND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TRBF | DBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.14 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.90 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 2.14 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TRBF vs. DBND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRBF drawdown since its inception was -2.59%, smaller than the maximum DBND drawdown of -9.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRBF and DBND.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRBF | DBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.59% | -9.39% | +6.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.83% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -5.03% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.09% | -2.46% | +0.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.89% | -2.25% | +1.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.19% | — |
Volatility
TRBF vs. DBND - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TRBF | DBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.90% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.59% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.73% | 3.24% | +0.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.73% | 5.04% | -1.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.73% | 5.04% | -1.31% |
TRBF vs. DBND - Expense Ratio Comparison
TRBF has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is lower than DBND's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
TRBF vs. DBND - Dividend Comparison
TRBF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.03%, less than DBND's 4.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBND DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF | 4.41% | 4.78% | 5.19% | 4.39% | 2.74% |
TRBF Angel Oak Total Return ETF | 4.03% | 1.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TRBF and DBND have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TRBF is cheaper at 0.44% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TRBF is cheaper with a 0.44% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for DBND.
DBND has the higher dividend yield at 4.41%, compared with 4.03% for TRBF.
They also come from different issuers: Angel Oak and DoubleLine. Their fees differ too: 0.44% for TRBF and 0.50% for DBND.
Find the right allocation for TRBF and DBND
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer