TRBF vs. BYLD
TRBF (Angel Oak Total Return ETF) and BYLD (iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. TRBF is actively managed, while BYLD is passively managed. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TRBF charges 0.44%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for BYLD.
Performance
TRBF vs. BYLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TRBF achieves a 0.82% return, which is significantly lower than BYLD's 1.50% return.
TRBF
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 0.81%
- YTD
- 0.82%
- 6M
- 0.84%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BYLD
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.88%
- YTD
- 1.50%
- 6M
- 1.48%
- 1Y
- 6.22%
- 3Y*
- 6.54%
- 5Y*
- 2.21%
- 10Y*
- 2.97%
TRBF vs. BYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TRBF Angel Oak Total Return ETF | 0.82% | 0.94% |
BYLD iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF | 1.50% | 1.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between TRBF and BYLD is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2025 | 0.67 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TRBF vs. BYLD — Risk / Return Rank
TRBF
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BYLD
TRBF vs. BYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Angel Oak Total Return ETF (TRBF) and iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF (BYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TRBF | BYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.31 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.30 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 9.29 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TRBF vs. BYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRBF drawdown since its inception was -2.59%, smaller than the maximum BYLD drawdown of -14.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRBF and BYLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRBF | BYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.59% | -14.75% | +12.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.71% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -3.94% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -14.65% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -14.75% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.19% | -0.13% | -1.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.83% | -2.50% | +1.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.67% | — |
Volatility
TRBF vs. BYLD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TRBF | BYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.13% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 3.06% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.73% | 3.85% | -0.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.73% | 5.21% | -1.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.73% | 5.43% | -1.70% |
TRBF vs. BYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
TRBF has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is higher than BYLD's 0.17% expense ratio.
Dividends
TRBF vs. BYLD - Dividend Comparison
TRBF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.13%, less than BYLD's 5.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BYLD iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF | 5.35% | 5.32% | 5.31% | 4.45% | 3.39% | 2.18% | 3.41% | 3.67% | 4.22% | 3.22% | 3.14% | 3.37% |
TRBF Angel Oak Total Return ETF | 3.13% | 1.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TRBF and BYLD have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BYLD is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BYLD is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.44% for TRBF.
BYLD has the higher dividend yield at 5.35%, compared with 3.13% for TRBF.
They also come from different issuers: Angel Oak and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.44% for TRBF and 0.17% for BYLD.
Find the right allocation for TRBF and BYLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer