PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FUL vs. COST
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

FUL vs. COST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in H.B. Fuller Company (FUL) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-3.57%
19.38%
FUL
COST

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FUL achieves a -5.41% return, which is significantly lower than COST's 46.90% return. Over the past 10 years, FUL has underperformed COST with an annualized return of 7.29%, while COST has yielded a comparatively higher 24.01% annualized return.


FUL

YTD

-5.41%

1M

1.76%

6M

-3.57%

1Y

1.61%

5Y (annualized)

10.47%

10Y (annualized)

7.29%

COST

YTD

46.90%

1M

7.35%

6M

19.38%

1Y

68.35%

5Y (annualized)

28.56%

10Y (annualized)

24.01%

Fundamentals


FULCOST
Market Cap$4.07B$411.21B
EPS$3.23$16.56
PE Ratio23.0956.04
PEG Ratio2.235.63
Total Revenue (TTM)$3.55B$254.45B
Gross Profit (TTM)$1.08B$32.10B
EBITDA (TTM)$568.35M$12.15B

Key characteristics


FULCOST
Sharpe Ratio0.073.48
Sortino Ratio0.264.15
Omega Ratio1.031.61
Calmar Ratio0.116.65
Martin Ratio0.2417.21
Ulcer Index6.87%3.97%
Daily Std Dev22.10%19.62%
Max Drawdown-68.23%-53.39%
Current Drawdown-11.40%0.00%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between FUL and COST is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FUL vs. COST - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for H.B. Fuller Company (FUL) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FUL, currently valued at 0.07, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.073.48
The chart of Sortino ratio for FUL, currently valued at 0.26, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.264.15
The chart of Omega ratio for FUL, currently valued at 1.03, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.031.61
The chart of Calmar ratio for FUL, currently valued at 0.11, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.116.65
The chart of Martin ratio for FUL, currently valued at 0.24, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.000.2417.21
FUL
COST

The current FUL Sharpe Ratio is 0.07, which is lower than the COST Sharpe Ratio of 3.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FUL and COST, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.07
3.48
FUL
COST

Dividends

FUL vs. COST - Dividend Comparison

FUL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, less than COST's 2.02% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
FUL
H.B. Fuller Company
1.15%0.99%1.03%0.82%1.25%1.23%1.44%1.10%1.14%1.40%1.03%0.74%
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
2.02%2.87%0.76%0.54%3.38%0.86%1.08%4.81%1.09%4.06%0.97%1.01%

Drawdowns

FUL vs. COST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FUL drawdown since its inception was -68.23%, which is greater than COST's maximum drawdown of -53.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FUL and COST. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-11.40%
0
FUL
COST

Volatility

FUL vs. COST - Volatility Comparison

H.B. Fuller Company (FUL) has a higher volatility of 8.18% compared to Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) at 5.83%. This indicates that FUL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
8.18%
5.83%
FUL
COST

Financials

FUL vs. COST - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between H.B. Fuller Company and Costco Wholesale Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items