TQQY vs. XTJL
TQQY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST QQQ ETF) and XTJL (Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TQQY returned 19.85% vs 15.64% for XTJL. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TQQY charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for XTJL.
Performance
TQQY vs. XTJL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TQQY achieves a 8.28% return, which is significantly higher than XTJL's 5.36% return.
TQQY
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 5.38%
- YTD
- 8.28%
- 6M
- 5.78%
- 1Y
- 19.85%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XTJL
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.16%
- YTD
- 5.36%
- 6M
- 6.38%
- 1Y
- 15.64%
- 3Y*
- 14.68%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TQQY vs. XTJL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TQQY GraniteShares YieldBOOST QQQ ETF | 8.28% | -5.07% |
XTJL Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July | 5.36% | 13.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between TQQY and XTJL is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2025 | 0.81 |
The correlation between TQQY and XTJL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TQQY vs. XTJL — Risk / Return Rank
TQQY
XTJL
TQQY vs. XTJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST QQQ ETF (TQQY) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TQQY | XTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.46 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.03 | 3.07 | -2.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.53 | 17.37 | -14.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TQQY | XTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 | 2.12 | -1.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.09 | 0.65 | -0.55 |
Drawdowns
TQQY vs. XTJL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TQQY drawdown since its inception was -25.31%, which is greater than XTJL's maximum drawdown of -23.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TQQY and XTJL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TQQY | XTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.31% | -23.24% | -2.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.35% | -5.12% | -14.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.70% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.27% | 0.00% | -3.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.63% | -4.04% | -5.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.87% | 0.90% | +6.97% |
Volatility
TQQY vs. XTJL - Volatility Comparison
GraniteShares YieldBOOST QQQ ETF (TQQY) has a higher volatility of 1.90% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL) at 0.33%. This indicates that TQQY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XTJL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TQQY | XTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.90% | 0.33% | +1.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.80% | 5.72% | +9.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.92% | 7.43% | +13.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.91% | 15.22% | +8.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.91% | 15.22% | +8.69% |
TQQY vs. XTJL - Expense Ratio Comparison
TQQY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than XTJL's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
TQQY vs. XTJL - Dividend Comparison
TQQY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 59.51%, while XTJL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
TQQY GraniteShares YieldBOOST QQQ ETF | 59.51% | 49.61% |
XTJL Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TQQY and XTJL have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TQQY has higher volatility (1.90%) compared to XTJL (0.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TQQY dropped -25.31% vs XTJL's -23.24%.
On 1-year performance, TQQY leads with 19.85% vs 15.64% for XTJL. On fees, XTJL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, XTJL has been the lower-risk option at 0.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TQQY has performed better with a 19.85% return vs 15.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XTJL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for TQQY.
TQQY has the higher dividend yield at 59.51%, compared with 0.00% for XTJL.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for TQQY and 0.79% for XTJL.
XTJL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TQQY and XTJL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer