PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TQQY vs. XTJL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TQQY vs. XTJL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares YieldBOOST QQQ ETF (TQQY) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TQQY achieves a 8.28% return, which is significantly higher than XTJL's 5.36% return.


TQQY

1D
0.11%
1M
5.38%
YTD
8.28%
6M
5.78%
1Y
19.85%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XTJL

1D
0.00%
1M
1.16%
YTD
5.36%
6M
6.38%
1Y
15.64%
3Y*
14.68%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TQQY vs. XTJL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TQQY and XTJL is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2025

0.81

The correlation between TQQY and XTJL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TQQY vs. XTJL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TQQY
TQQY Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
TQQY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TQQY Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
TQQY Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
TQQY Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
TQQY Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

XTJL
XTJL Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
XTJL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XTJL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
XTJL Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
XTJL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
XTJL Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TQQY vs. XTJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST QQQ ETF (TQQY) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TQQYXTJLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.46

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.03

3.07

-2.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.53

17.37

-14.84

TQQY vs. XTJL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TQQY Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is lower than the XTJL Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TQQY and XTJL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TQQYXTJLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

2.12

-1.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.09

0.65

-0.55

Drawdowns

TQQY vs. XTJL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TQQY drawdown since its inception was -25.31%, which is greater than XTJL's maximum drawdown of -23.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TQQY and XTJL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TQQYXTJLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.31%

-23.24%

-2.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.35%

-5.12%

-14.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.27%

0.00%

-3.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.63%

-4.04%

-5.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.87%

0.90%

+6.97%

Volatility

TQQY vs. XTJL - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares YieldBOOST QQQ ETF (TQQY) has a higher volatility of 1.90% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL) at 0.33%. This indicates that TQQY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XTJL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TQQYXTJLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.90%

0.33%

+1.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.80%

5.72%

+9.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.92%

7.43%

+13.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.91%

15.22%

+8.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.91%

15.22%

+8.69%

TQQY vs. XTJL - Expense Ratio Comparison

TQQY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than XTJL's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

TQQY vs. XTJL - Dividend Comparison

TQQY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 59.51%, while XTJL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


TQQY and XTJL have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TQQY has higher volatility (1.90%) compared to XTJL (0.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TQQY dropped -25.31% vs XTJL's -23.24%.

On 1-year performance, TQQY leads with 19.85% vs 15.64% for XTJL. On fees, XTJL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, XTJL has been the lower-risk option at 0.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TQQY has performed better with a 19.85% return vs 15.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XTJL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for TQQY.

TQQY has the higher dividend yield at 59.51%, compared with 0.00% for XTJL.

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for TQQY and 0.79% for XTJL.

XTJL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TQQY and XTJL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer