TQQY vs. PLTW

Last updated Jul 21, 2026

TQQY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST QQQ ETF) and PLTW (PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TQQY is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while PLTW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TQQY returned 4.89% vs -22.07% for PLTW. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TQQY charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for PLTW.

Performance

TQQY vs. PLTW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares YieldBOOST QQQ ETF (TQQY) and PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TQQY achieves a 3.32% return, which is significantly higher than PLTW's -31.53% return.

TQQY

• 1D: -0.27%
• 1M: -1.72%
• 6M: 2.90%
• YTD: 3.32%
• 1Y: 4.89%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -2.10%

PLTW

• 1D: 2.24%
• 1M: 5.40%
• 6M: -28.11%
• YTD: -31.53%
• 1Y: -22.07%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -8.79%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TQQY vs. PLTW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TQQY GraniteShares YieldBOOST QQQ ETF	3.32%	-6.04%
PLTW PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF	-31.53%	114.63%

Correlation

The correlation between TQQY and PLTW is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.43
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2025	0.47

Return for Risk

TQQY vs. PLTW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TQQY

TQQY Risk / Return Rank: 14
TQQY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
TQQY Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
TQQY Omega Ratio Rank: 15
TQQY Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
TQQY Martin Ratio Rank: 14

PLTW

PLTW Risk / Return Rank: 7
PLTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
PLTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
PLTW Omega Ratio Rank: 8
PLTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
PLTW Martin Ratio Rank: 6

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TQQY vs. PLTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST QQQ ETF (TQQY) and PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TQQY	PLTW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.23	-0.36	+0.59
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.41	-0.13	+0.54
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	0.98	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.25	-0.39	+0.64
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.60	-0.73	+1.33

TQQY vs. PLTW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TQQY Sharpe Ratio is 0.23, which is higher than the PLTW Sharpe Ratio of -0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TQQY and PLTW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TQQY vs. PLTW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TQQY drawdown since its inception was -26.06%, smaller than the maximum PLTW drawdown of -57.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TQQY and PLTW.

Drawdown Indicators

	TQQY	PLTW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.06%	-57.27%	+31.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.35%	-57.27%	+37.92%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.70%	-44.00%	+36.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.70%	-24.60%	+14.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.20%	30.10%	-21.90%

Volatility

TQQY vs. PLTW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GraniteShares YieldBOOST QQQ ETF (TQQY) is 3.72%, while PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW) has a volatility of 18.74%. This indicates that TQQY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLTW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TQQY	PLTW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.72%	18.74%	-15.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.70%	48.11%	-34.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.39%	61.79%	-40.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.28%	73.64%	-50.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.28%	73.64%	-50.36%

TQQY vs. PLTW - Expense Ratio Comparison

TQQY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than PLTW's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

TQQY vs. PLTW - Dividend Comparison

TQQY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 61.18%, less than PLTW's 128.07% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
PLTW PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF	128.07%	72.40%
TQQY GraniteShares YieldBOOST QQQ ETF	61.18%	49.61%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TQQY and PLTW in my portfolio?

TQQY and PLTW have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TQQY or PLTW?

PLTW has higher volatility (18.74%) compared to TQQY (3.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TQQY dropped -26.06% vs PLTW's -57.27%.

Which ETF is better, TQQY or PLTW?

On 1-year performance, TQQY leads with 4.89% vs -22.07% for PLTW. On fees, PLTW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, TQQY has been the lower-risk option at 3.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TQQY or PLTW?

Over the 1-year period, TQQY has performed better with a 4.89% return vs -22.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TQQY or PLTW?

PLTW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for TQQY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TQQY or PLTW?

PLTW has the higher dividend yield at 128.07%, compared with 61.18% for TQQY.

What is the main difference between TQQY and PLTW?

TQQY is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while PLTW is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for TQQY and 0.99% for PLTW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TQQY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.23 vs -0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.