TQQY vs. MUU

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TQQY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST QQQ ETF) and MUU (Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TQQY returned 19.85% vs 6522.95% for MUU. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TQQY charges 1.07%/yr vs 1.06%/yr for MUU.

Performance

TQQY vs. MUU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares YieldBOOST QQQ ETF (TQQY) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TQQY achieves a 8.28% return, which is significantly lower than MUU's 961.23% return.

TQQY

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: 5.38%
• YTD: 8.28%
• 6M: 5.78%
• 1Y: 19.85%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MUU

• 1D: 3.08%
• 1M: 218.90%
• YTD: 961.23%
• 6M: 1,422.01%
• 1Y: 6,522.95%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TQQY vs. MUU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TQQY GraniteShares YieldBOOST QQQ ETF	8.28%	-5.07%
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares	961.23%	460.32%

Correlation

The correlation between TQQY and MUU is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.49
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2025	0.52

The correlation between TQQY and MUU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

TQQY vs. MUU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TQQY

TQQY Risk / Return Rank: 24
TQQY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
TQQY Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
TQQY Omega Ratio Rank: 30
TQQY Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
TQQY Martin Ratio Rank: 21

MUU

MUU Risk / Return Rank: 99
MUU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
MUU Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
MUU Omega Ratio Rank: 97
MUU Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
MUU Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TQQY vs. MUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST QQQ ETF (TQQY) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TQQY	MUU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.95	50.40	-49.45
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.22	7.17	-5.95
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.91	-0.71
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.03	125.85	-124.82
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.53	426.84	-424.31
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TQQY vs. MUU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TQQY Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is lower than the MUU Sharpe Ratio of 50.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TQQY and MUU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TQQY	MUU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95	50.40	-49.45
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.09	6.68	-6.59

Drawdowns

TQQY vs. MUU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TQQY drawdown since its inception was -25.31%, smaller than the maximum MUU drawdown of -75.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TQQY and MUU.

Drawdown Indicators

	TQQY	MUU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.31%	-75.07%	+49.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.35%	-52.72%	+33.37%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.27%	0.00%	-3.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.63%	-23.44%	+13.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.87%	15.51%	-7.64%

Volatility

TQQY vs. MUU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GraniteShares YieldBOOST QQQ ETF (TQQY) is 1.90%, while Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU) has a volatility of 54.78%. This indicates that TQQY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MUU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TQQY	MUU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.90%	54.78%	-52.88%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.80%	105.07%	-90.27%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.92%	131.77%	-110.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.91%	133.67%	-109.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.91%	133.67%	-109.76%

TQQY vs. MUU - Expense Ratio Comparison

TQQY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than MUU's 1.06% expense ratio.

Dividends

TQQY vs. MUU - Dividend Comparison

TQQY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 59.51%, more than MUU's 0.46% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares	0.46%	4.27%	0.31%
TQQY GraniteShares YieldBOOST QQQ ETF	59.51%	49.61%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TQQY and MUU in my portfolio?

TQQY and MUU have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TQQY or MUU?

MUU has higher volatility (54.78%) compared to TQQY (1.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TQQY dropped -25.31% vs MUU's -75.07%.

Which ETF is better, TQQY or MUU?

On 1-year performance, MUU leads with 6522.95% vs 19.85% for TQQY. On fees, MUU is cheaper at 1.06% per year. On volatility, TQQY has been the lower-risk option at 1.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TQQY or MUU?

Over the 1-year period, MUU has performed better with a 6522.95% return vs 19.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TQQY or MUU?

MUU is cheaper with a 1.06% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for TQQY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TQQY or MUU?

TQQY has the higher dividend yield at 59.51%, compared with 0.46% for MUU.

What is the main difference between TQQY and MUU?

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for TQQY and 1.06% for MUU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MUU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (50.40 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.