PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TQQY vs. DBE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TQQY vs. DBE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares YieldBOOST QQQ ETF (TQQY) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TQQY achieves a 8.12% return, which is significantly lower than DBE's 79.04% return.


TQQY

1D
-0.15%
1M
4.37%
YTD
8.12%
6M
4.78%
1Y
19.17%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DBE

1D
-2.52%
1M
-6.01%
YTD
79.04%
6M
69.31%
1Y
81.31%
3Y*
22.41%
5Y*
19.05%
10Y*
11.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TQQY vs. DBE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
TQQY
GraniteShares YieldBOOST QQQ ETF
8.12%-5.07%
DBE
Invesco DB Energy Fund
79.04%-4.29%

Correlation

The correlation between TQQY and DBE is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2025

-0.10

The correlation between TQQY and DBE shifts across timeframes, from -0.20 (1 year) to -0.10 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TQQY vs. DBE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TQQY
TQQY Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
TQQY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TQQY Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
TQQY Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
TQQY Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
TQQY Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

DBE
DBE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
DBE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBE Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
DBE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBE Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TQQY vs. DBE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST QQQ ETF (TQQY) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TQQYDBEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.39

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.99

5.67

-4.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.44

11.08

-8.64

TQQY vs. DBE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TQQY Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is lower than the DBE Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TQQY and DBE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TQQYDBEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

2.33

-1.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.09

0.09

0.00

Drawdowns

TQQY vs. DBE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TQQY drawdown since its inception was -25.31%, smaller than the maximum DBE drawdown of -86.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TQQY and DBE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TQQYDBEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.31%

-86.69%

+61.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.35%

-14.41%

-4.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.41%

-32.03%

+28.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.61%

-57.30%

+47.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.88%

7.37%

+0.51%

Volatility

TQQY vs. DBE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GraniteShares YieldBOOST QQQ ETF (TQQY) is 1.84%, while Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE) has a volatility of 13.05%. This indicates that TQQY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TQQYDBEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.84%

13.05%

-11.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.75%

30.97%

-16.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.90%

35.07%

-14.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.87%

29.41%

-5.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.87%

28.34%

-4.47%

TQQY vs. DBE - Expense Ratio Comparison

TQQY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than DBE's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

TQQY vs. DBE - Dividend Comparison

TQQY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 59.60%, more than DBE's 2.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DBE
Invesco DB Energy Fund
2.16%3.86%6.32%3.87%0.75%0.00%0.00%1.79%1.67%
TQQY
GraniteShares YieldBOOST QQQ ETF
59.60%49.61%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TQQY and DBE have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBE has higher volatility (13.05%) compared to TQQY (1.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TQQY dropped -25.31% vs DBE's -86.69%.

On 1-year performance, DBE leads with 81.31% vs 19.17% for TQQY. On fees, DBE is cheaper at 0.78% per year. On volatility, TQQY has been the lower-risk option at 1.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DBE has performed better with a 81.31% return vs 19.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DBE is cheaper with a 0.78% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for TQQY.

TQQY has the higher dividend yield at 59.60%, compared with 2.16% for DBE.

TQQY is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while DBE is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for TQQY and 0.78% for DBE.

DBE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TQQY and DBE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer