TQQY vs. BLOX
TQQY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST QQQ ETF) and BLOX (Nicholas Crypto Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TQQY is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while BLOX is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Nicholas. Both are actively managed. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TQQY charges 1.07%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for BLOX.
Performance
TQQY vs. BLOX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TQQY achieves a 8.28% return, which is significantly lower than BLOX's 16.52% return.
TQQY
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 5.38%
- YTD
- 8.28%
- 6M
- 5.78%
- 1Y
- 19.85%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BLOX
- 1D
- -2.56%
- 1M
- 10.59%
- YTD
- 16.52%
- 6M
- 5.53%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TQQY vs. BLOX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TQQY GraniteShares YieldBOOST QQQ ETF | 8.28% | 9.17% |
BLOX Nicholas Crypto Income ETF | 16.52% | 9.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between TQQY and BLOX is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2025 | 0.54 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TQQY vs. BLOX — Risk / Return Rank
TQQY
BLOX
TQQY vs. BLOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST QQQ ETF (TQQY) and Nicholas Crypto Income ETF (BLOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TQQY | BLOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.03 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.53 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TQQY | BLOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.09 | 0.54 | -0.45 |
Drawdowns
TQQY vs. BLOX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TQQY drawdown since its inception was -25.31%, smaller than the maximum BLOX drawdown of -47.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TQQY and BLOX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TQQY | BLOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.31% | -47.09% | +21.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.35% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.27% | -19.45% | +16.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.63% | -18.53% | +8.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.87% | — | — |
Volatility
TQQY vs. BLOX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TQQY | BLOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.90% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.80% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.92% | 53.44% | -32.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.91% | 53.44% | -29.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.91% | 53.44% | -29.53% |
TQQY vs. BLOX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TQQY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than BLOX's 1.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
TQQY vs. BLOX - Dividend Comparison
TQQY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 59.51%, more than BLOX's 36.81% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BLOX Nicholas Crypto Income ETF | 36.81% | 22.69% |
TQQY GraniteShares YieldBOOST QQQ ETF | 59.51% | 49.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TQQY and BLOX have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BLOX is cheaper at 1.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BLOX is cheaper with a 1.03% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for TQQY.
TQQY has the higher dividend yield at 59.51%, compared with 36.81% for BLOX.
TQQY is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while BLOX is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Nicholas. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for TQQY and 1.03% for BLOX.
Find the right allocation for TQQY and BLOX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer