TQQQ vs. YINN
TQQQ (ProShares UltraPro QQQ) and YINN (Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds - TQQQ tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index (300%) while YINN tracks the FTSE China 50 Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, TQQQ returned 44.55%/yr vs -18.37%/yr for YINN. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TQQQ charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.52%/yr for YINN.
Performance
TQQQ vs. YINN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TQQQ achieves a 47.28% return, which is significantly higher than YINN's -29.95% return. Over the past 10 years, TQQQ has outperformed YINN with an annualized return of 44.55%, while YINN has yielded a comparatively lower -18.37% annualized return.
TQQQ
- 1D
- 1.99%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- YTD
- 47.28%
- 6M
- 47.23%
- 1Y
- 106.26%
- 3Y*
- 59.79%
- 5Y*
- 24.34%
- 10Y*
- 44.55%
YINN
- 1D
- 3.08%
- 1M
- -23.37%
- YTD
- -29.95%
- 6M
- -32.53%
- 1Y
- -27.68%
- 3Y*
- -6.43%
- 5Y*
- -38.50%
- 10Y*
- -18.37%
TQQQ vs. YINN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ | 47.28% | 34.35% | 58.27% | 198.04% | -79.09% | 82.98% | 110.05% | 133.84% | -19.79% | 118.06% |
YINN Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares | -29.95% | 54.21% | 36.06% | -53.08% | -71.97% | -58.56% | -7.75% | 28.92% | -48.47% | 129.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between TQQQ and YINN is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2010 | 0.56 |
The correlation between TQQQ and YINN shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (3 years) to 0.56 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
TQQQ vs. YINN - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TQQQ
YINN
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Industrials
Utilities
Basic Materials
Energy
Financial Services
Real Estate
Technology
TQQQ
YINN
Communication Services
TQQQ
YINN
Consumer Cyclical
TQQQ
YINN
Consumer Defensive
TQQQ
YINN
Healthcare
TQQQ
YINN
Industrials
TQQQ
YINN
Utilities
TQQQ
YINN
Basic Materials
TQQQ
YINN
Energy
TQQQ
YINN
Financial Services
TQQQ
YINN
Real Estate
TQQQ
YINN
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TQQQ vs. YINN — Risk / Return Rank
TQQQ
YINN
TQQQ vs. YINN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) and Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares (YINN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TQQQ | YINN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 0.96 | +0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.89 | -0.56 | +3.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.26 | -1.09 | +10.34 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TQQQ vs. YINN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TQQQ drawdown since its inception was -81.66%, smaller than the maximum YINN drawdown of -98.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TQQQ and YINN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TQQQ | YINN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.66% | -98.87% | +17.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.97% | -49.61% | +12.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -58.04% | -69.08% | +11.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -81.66% | -96.28% | +14.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -81.66% | -98.59% | +16.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.12% | -97.52% | +86.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.51% | -68.51% | +50.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.52% | 25.53% | -14.01% |
Volatility
TQQQ vs. YINN - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) has a higher volatility of 22.79% compared to Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares (YINN) at 18.63%. This indicates that TQQQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YINN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TQQQ | YINN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.79% | 18.63% | +4.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.26% | 42.54% | -1.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.24% | 58.74% | -7.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 67.02% | 94.19% | -27.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 66.22% | 81.73% | -15.51% |
TQQQ vs. YINN - Expense Ratio Comparison
TQQQ has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than YINN's 1.52% expense ratio.
Dividends
TQQQ vs. YINN - Dividend Comparison
TQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%, less than YINN's 1.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ | 0.41% | 0.65% | 1.27% | 1.26% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% |
YINN Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares | 1.42% | 1.12% | 1.81% | 4.17% | 1.16% | 0.73% | 0.76% | 1.38% | 1.02% | 1.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TQQQ and YINN have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TQQQ has higher volatility (22.79%) compared to YINN (18.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TQQQ dropped -81.66% vs YINN's -98.87%.
On 10-year performance, TQQQ leads with 44.55% vs -18.37% for YINN. On fees, TQQQ is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, YINN has been the lower-risk option at 18.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, TQQQ has performed better with a 44.55% return vs -18.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TQQQ is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.52% for YINN.
YINN has the higher dividend yield at 1.42%, compared with 0.41% for TQQQ.
TQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (300%), while YINN tracks FTSE China 50 Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for TQQQ and 1.52% for YINN.
TQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TQQQ and YINN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer