PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TQQQ vs. USMV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TQQQ vs. USMV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) and iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TQQQ achieves a 38.79% return, which is significantly higher than USMV's 1.99% return. Over the past 10 years, TQQQ has outperformed USMV with an annualized return of 42.84%, while USMV has yielded a comparatively lower 9.85% annualized return.


TQQQ

1D
-14.28%
1M
-4.23%
YTD
38.79%
6M
30.51%
1Y
98.25%
3Y*
60.11%
5Y*
24.09%
10Y*
42.84%

USMV

1D
-1.06%
1M
1.71%
YTD
1.99%
6M
1.96%
1Y
3.62%
3Y*
11.76%
5Y*
7.31%
10Y*
9.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TQQQ vs. USMV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
38.79%34.35%58.27%198.04%-79.09%82.98%110.05%133.84%-19.79%118.06%
USMV
iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF
1.99%7.65%15.74%10.33%-9.43%20.85%5.64%27.69%1.33%18.91%

Correlation

The correlation between TQQQ and USMV is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2011

0.68

Over the past year, the correlation between TQQQ and USMV has dropped to 0.35 - well below their long-term average of 0.68, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

TQQQ vs. USMV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TQQQ
USMV

Technology

53.8%
30.8%

Communication Services

15.8%
5.9%

Consumer Cyclical

12.3%
5.7%

Consumer Defensive

7.7%
10.0%

Healthcare

4.2%
12.5%

Industrials

2.8%
5.7%

Utilities

1.4%
7.5%

Basic Materials

1.1%
2.2%

Energy

0.6%
3.6%

Financial Services

0.2%
12.4%

Real Estate

0.1%
2.2%

Technology

TQQQ
53.8%
USMV
30.8%

Communication Services

TQQQ
15.8%
USMV
5.9%

Consumer Cyclical

TQQQ
12.3%
USMV
5.7%

Consumer Defensive

TQQQ
7.7%
USMV
10.0%

Healthcare

TQQQ
4.2%
USMV
12.5%

Industrials

TQQQ
2.8%
USMV
5.7%

Utilities

TQQQ
1.4%
USMV
7.5%

Basic Materials

TQQQ
1.1%
USMV
2.2%

Energy

TQQQ
0.6%
USMV
3.6%

Financial Services

TQQQ
0.2%
USMV
12.4%

Real Estate

TQQQ
0.1%
USMV
2.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TQQQ vs. USMV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TQQQ
TQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
TQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
TQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
TQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
TQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

USMV
USMV Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
USMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
USMV Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
USMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
USMV Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TQQQ vs. USMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) and iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TQQQUSMVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.09

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.83

0.67

+2.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.20

2.24

+6.96

TQQQ vs. USMV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TQQQ Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is higher than the USMV Sharpe Ratio of 0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TQQQ and USMV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TQQQUSMVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.10

0.51

+1.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

0.59

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

0.68

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

0.86

-0.15

Drawdowns

TQQQ vs. USMV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TQQQ drawdown since its inception was -81.66%, which is greater than USMV's maximum drawdown of -33.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TQQQ and USMV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TQQQUSMVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.66%

-33.10%

-48.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.97%

-6.46%

-30.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-58.04%

-9.36%

-48.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-81.66%

-17.93%

-63.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-81.66%

-33.10%

-48.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.25%

-1.82%

-14.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.52%

-2.88%

-15.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.33%

1.94%

+9.39%

Volatility

TQQQ vs. USMV - Volatility Comparison

ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) has a higher volatility of 20.42% compared to iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV) at 2.61%. This indicates that TQQQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TQQQUSMVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.42%

2.61%

+17.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.33%

6.01%

+33.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.81%

8.57%

+41.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

66.79%

12.36%

+54.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

66.11%

14.51%

+51.60%

TQQQ vs. USMV - Expense Ratio Comparison

TQQQ has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than USMV's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

TQQQ vs. USMV - Dividend Comparison

TQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, less than USMV's 1.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
0.43%0.65%1.27%1.26%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.06%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.01%
USMV
iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF
1.54%1.49%1.67%1.82%1.62%1.26%1.81%1.88%2.12%1.77%2.22%2.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


TQQQ and USMV have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TQQQ has higher volatility (20.42%) compared to USMV (2.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TQQQ dropped -81.66% vs USMV's -33.10%.

On 10-year performance, TQQQ leads with 42.84% vs 9.85% for USMV. On fees, USMV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, USMV has been the lower-risk option at 2.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, TQQQ has performed better with a 42.84% return vs 9.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

USMV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TQQQ.

USMV has the higher dividend yield at 1.54%, compared with 0.43% for TQQQ.

TQQQ is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while USMV is Large Cap Blend Equities. TQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (300%), while USMV tracks MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for TQQQ and 0.15% for USMV.

TQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TQQQ and USMV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer