TQQQ vs. USML
TQQQ (ProShares UltraPro QQQ) and USML (ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Minimum Volatility Factor TR ETN) are both Leveraged Equities funds - TQQQ tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index (300%) while USML tracks the MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, TQQQ returned 24.09%/yr vs 7.85%/yr for USML. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
TQQQ vs. USML - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TQQQ achieves a 38.79% return, which is significantly higher than USML's 1.71% return.
TQQQ
- 1D
- -14.28%
- 1M
- -4.23%
- YTD
- 38.79%
- 6M
- 30.51%
- 1Y
- 98.25%
- 3Y*
- 60.11%
- 5Y*
- 24.09%
- 10Y*
- 42.84%
USML
- 1D
- -1.73%
- 1M
- 3.16%
- YTD
- 1.71%
- 6M
- 1.67%
- 1Y
- 1.50%
- 3Y*
- 16.28%
- 5Y*
- 7.85%
- 10Y*
- —
TQQQ vs. USML - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ | 38.79% | 34.35% | 58.27% | 198.04% | -79.09% | 57.96% |
USML ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Minimum Volatility Factor TR ETN | 1.71% | 9.33% | 23.97% | 11.37% | -22.87% | 42.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between TQQQ and USML is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2021 | 0.61 |
Over the past year, the correlation between TQQQ and USML has dropped to 0.36 - well below their long-term average of 0.61, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TQQQ vs. USML — Risk / Return Rank
TQQQ
USML
TQQQ vs. USML - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) and ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Minimum Volatility Factor TR ETN (USML). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TQQQ | USML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.04 | +0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.83 | 0.22 | +2.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.20 | 0.67 | +8.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TQQQ | USML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.10 | 0.18 | +1.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | 0.32 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | 0.42 | +0.29 |
Drawdowns
TQQQ vs. USML - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TQQQ drawdown since its inception was -81.66%, which is greater than USML's maximum drawdown of -35.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TQQQ and USML.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TQQQ | USML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.66% | -35.34% | -46.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.97% | -13.09% | -23.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -58.04% | -19.14% | -38.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -81.66% | -35.34% | -46.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -81.66% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.25% | -4.86% | -11.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.52% | -10.40% | -8.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.33% | 4.35% | +6.98% |
Volatility
TQQQ vs. USML - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) has a higher volatility of 20.42% compared to ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Minimum Volatility Factor TR ETN (USML) at 4.58%. This indicates that TQQQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USML based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TQQQ | USML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.42% | 4.58% | +15.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.33% | 11.57% | +27.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.81% | 16.45% | +33.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 66.79% | 24.47% | +42.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 66.11% | 24.29% | +41.82% |
TQQQ vs. USML - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both TQQQ and USML have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
TQQQ vs. USML - Dividend Comparison
TQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, while USML has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ | 0.43% | 0.65% | 1.27% | 1.26% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% |
USML ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Minimum Volatility Factor TR ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TQQQ and USML have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TQQQ has higher volatility (20.42%) compared to USML (4.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TQQQ dropped -81.66% vs USML's -35.34%.
On 5-year performance, TQQQ leads with 24.09% vs 7.85% for USML. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, USML has been the lower-risk option at 4.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, TQQQ has performed better with a 24.09% return vs 7.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TQQQ and USML have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
TQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.43%, compared with 0.00% for USML.
TQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (300%), while USML tracks MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and UBS.
TQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TQQQ and USML
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer