TQQQ vs. MTUM
TQQQ (ProShares UltraPro QQQ) and MTUM (iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TQQQ is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (300%), while MTUM is a Momentum fund tracking the MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, TQQQ returned 44.55%/yr vs 17.15%/yr for MTUM. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TQQQ charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for MTUM.
Performance
TQQQ vs. MTUM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TQQQ achieves a 47.28% return, which is significantly higher than MTUM's 29.72% return. Over the past 10 years, TQQQ has outperformed MTUM with an annualized return of 44.55%, while MTUM has yielded a comparatively lower 17.15% annualized return.
TQQQ
- 1D
- 1.99%
- 1M
- 2.89%
- YTD
- 47.28%
- 6M
- 47.23%
- 1Y
- 114.36%
- 3Y*
- 59.79%
- 5Y*
- 24.34%
- 10Y*
- 44.55%
MTUM
- 1D
- 1.69%
- 1M
- 8.76%
- YTD
- 29.72%
- 6M
- 30.51%
- 1Y
- 42.02%
- 3Y*
- 33.16%
- 5Y*
- 14.96%
- 10Y*
- 17.15%
TQQQ vs. MTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ | 47.28% | 34.35% | 58.27% | 198.04% | -79.09% | 82.98% | 110.05% | 133.84% | -19.79% | 118.06% |
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | 29.72% | 22.15% | 32.89% | 9.15% | -18.27% | 13.36% | 29.86% | 27.25% | -1.67% | 37.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between TQQQ and MTUM is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2013 | 0.85 |
The correlation between TQQQ and MTUM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
TQQQ vs. MTUM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TQQQ
MTUM
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Industrials
Utilities
Basic Materials
Energy
Financial Services
Real Estate
Technology
TQQQ
MTUM
Communication Services
TQQQ
MTUM
Consumer Cyclical
TQQQ
MTUM
Consumer Defensive
TQQQ
MTUM
Healthcare
TQQQ
MTUM
Industrials
TQQQ
MTUM
Utilities
TQQQ
MTUM
Basic Materials
TQQQ
MTUM
Energy
TQQQ
MTUM
Financial Services
TQQQ
MTUM
Real Estate
TQQQ
MTUM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TQQQ vs. MTUM — Risk / Return Rank
TQQQ
MTUM
TQQQ vs. MTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TQQQ | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.36 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.89 | 3.55 | -0.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.26 | 13.66 | -4.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TQQQ vs. MTUM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TQQQ drawdown since its inception was -81.66%, which is greater than MTUM's maximum drawdown of -34.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TQQQ and MTUM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TQQQ | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.66% | -34.08% | -47.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.97% | -11.54% | -25.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -58.04% | -20.99% | -37.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -81.66% | -32.28% | -49.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -81.66% | -34.08% | -47.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.12% | -1.55% | -9.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.51% | -6.20% | -12.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.52% | 2.99% | +8.53% |
Volatility
TQQQ vs. MTUM - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) has a higher volatility of 22.79% compared to iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) at 10.89%. This indicates that TQQQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TQQQ | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.79% | 10.89% | +11.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.26% | 18.63% | +22.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.24% | 20.87% | +30.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 67.02% | 20.94% | +46.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 66.22% | 21.20% | +45.02% |
TQQQ vs. MTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison
TQQQ has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than MTUM's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
TQQQ vs. MTUM - Dividend Comparison
TQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%, less than MTUM's 0.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | 0.61% | 0.91% | 0.75% | 1.35% | 1.80% | 0.55% | 0.83% | 1.48% | 1.27% | 1.02% | 1.43% | 1.12% |
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ | 0.41% | 0.65% | 1.27% | 1.26% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TQQQ and MTUM have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TQQQ has higher volatility (22.79%) compared to MTUM (10.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TQQQ dropped -81.66% vs MTUM's -34.08%.
On 10-year performance, TQQQ leads with 44.55% vs 17.15% for MTUM. On fees, MTUM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, MTUM has been the lower-risk option at 10.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, TQQQ has performed better with a 44.55% return vs 17.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MTUM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TQQQ.
MTUM has the higher dividend yield at 0.61%, compared with 0.41% for TQQQ.
TQQQ is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while MTUM is Momentum. TQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (300%), while MTUM tracks MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for TQQQ and 0.15% for MTUM.
TQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TQQQ and MTUM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer