PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
TQQQ vs. LINT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

TQQQ vs. LINT

Last updated Aug 4, 2026
Documentation

TQQQ (ProShares UltraPro QQQ) and LINT (Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds. TQQQ is passively managed, while LINT is actively managed. Their 0.63 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. TQQQ charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for LINT.

Performance

TQQQ vs. LINT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TQQQ achieves a 29.42% return, which is significantly lower than LINT's 266.23% return.

TQQQ

1D
5.17%
1M
-7.35%
6M
23.83%
YTD
29.42%
1Y
64.98%
3Y*
50.64%
5Y*
16.02%
10Y*
39.51%
ALL TIME*
42.74%

LINT

1D
1.75%
1M
-46.62%
6M
135.02%
YTD
266.23%
1Y
—
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
ALL TIME*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)

LINT

Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares
$19.84M$20.02M$35.16M

TQQQ

ProShares UltraPro QQQ
$4.46B$4.47B$5.36B

TQQQ vs. LINT - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ		29.42%7.37%
LINT
Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares		266.23%5.81%

Correlation

The correlation between TQQQ and LINT is 0.63, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025

0.63

TQQQ vs. LINT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
TQQQ
LINT

Technology

53.8%
100.0%

Communication Services

15.8%

-

Consumer Cyclical

12.3%

-

Consumer Defensive

7.7%

-

Healthcare

4.2%

-

Industrials

2.8%

-

Utilities

1.4%

-

Basic Materials

1.1%

-

Energy

0.6%

-

Financial Services

0.2%

-

Real Estate

0.1%

-

Technology

TQQQ
53.8%
LINT
100.0%

Communication Services

TQQQ
15.8%
LINT

-

Consumer Cyclical

TQQQ
12.3%
LINT

-

Consumer Defensive

TQQQ
7.7%
LINT

-

Healthcare

TQQQ
4.2%
LINT

-

Industrials

TQQQ
2.8%
LINT

-

Utilities

TQQQ
1.4%
LINT

-

Basic Materials

TQQQ
1.1%
LINT

-

Energy

TQQQ
0.6%
LINT

-

Financial Services

TQQQ
0.2%
LINT

-

Real Estate

TQQQ
0.1%
LINT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

ProShares UltraPro QQQ

Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares

Often compared with TQQQ:
TQQQ vs. QQQTQQQ vs. SOXLTQQQ vs. QLDTQQQ vs. SQQQTQQQ vs. UPROTQQQ vs. SPXLTQQQ vs. TECL
Often compared with LINT:
LINT vs. INTWLINT vs. SOXLLINT vs. YINNLINT vs. ARMGLINT vs. XXXXLINT vs. SPYQLINT vs. MSTU

Return for Risk

TQQQ vs. LINT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.
TQQQ
TQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
TQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
TQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
TQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
TQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
LINT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TQQQ vs. LINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

TQQQLINTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.14

—

—

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.68

—

—

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

—

—

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.77

—

—

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.90

—

—

TQQQ vs. LINT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TQQQ vs. LINT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TQQQ drawdown since its inception was -81.66%, which is greater than LINT's maximum drawdown of -69.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TQQQ and LINT.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

TQQQLINTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.66%

-69.02%

-12.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.97%

—

—

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-58.04%

—

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-81.66%

—

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-81.66%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.90%

-62.23%

+40.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.50%

-24.07%

+5.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.31%

—

—

Volatility

TQQQ vs. LINT - Volatility Comparison

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

TQQQLINTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.63%

—

—

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

47.88%

—

—

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

57.57%

169.02%

-111.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

68.10%

169.02%

-100.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

66.61%

169.02%

-102.41%

TQQQ vs. LINT - Expense Ratio Comparison

TQQQ has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than LINT's 0.97% expense ratio.

Dividends

TQQQ vs. LINT - Dividend Comparison

TQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, less than LINT's 0.74% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LINT
Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares		0.74%0.25%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ		0.56%0.65%1.27%1.26%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.06%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

TQQQ and LINT have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TQQQ is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TQQQ is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for LINT.

LINT has the higher dividend yield at 0.74%, compared with 0.56% for TQQQ.

They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for TQQQ and 0.97% for LINT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TQQQ and LINT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer