TQQQ vs. LINT

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

TQQQ (ProShares UltraPro QQQ) and LINT (Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds. TQQQ is passively managed, while LINT is actively managed. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TQQQ charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for LINT.

Performance

TQQQ vs. LINT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TQQQ achieves a 41.43% return, which is significantly lower than LINT's 744.89% return.

TQQQ

• 1D: -9.86%
• 1M: -4.37%
• YTD: 41.43%
• 6M: 35.75%
• 1Y: 100.69%
• 3Y*: 58.02%
• 5Y*: 21.47%
• 10Y*: 45.48%

LINT

• 1D: -12.86%
• 1M: 11.99%
• YTD: 744.89%
• 6M: 773.46%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TQQQ vs. LINT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ	41.43%	7.37%
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	744.89%	5.81%

Correlation

The correlation between TQQQ and LINT is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025	0.56

TQQQ vs. LINT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TQQQ	LINT
Technology	53.8%	100.0%
Communication Services	15.8%	-
Consumer Cyclical	12.3%	-
Consumer Defensive	7.7%	-
Healthcare	4.2%	-
Industrials	2.8%	-
Utilities	1.4%	-
Basic Materials	1.1%	-
Energy	0.6%	-
Financial Services	0.2%	-
Real Estate	0.1%	-

Return for Risk

TQQQ vs. LINT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TQQQ

TQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 53
TQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
TQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
TQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 49
TQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
TQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 52

LINT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TQQQ vs. LINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TQQQ	LINT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.90	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.27	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.74	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.72	—	—

Drawdowns

TQQQ vs. LINT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TQQQ drawdown since its inception was -81.66%, which is greater than LINT's maximum drawdown of -49.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TQQQ and LINT.

Drawdown Indicators

	TQQQ	LINT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-81.66%	-49.54%	-32.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-36.97%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-58.04%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-81.66%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-81.66%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.65%	-12.86%	-1.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.49%	-20.48%	+1.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.59%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TQQQ	LINT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	27.27%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	43.35%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	53.39%	168.83%	-115.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	67.41%	168.83%	-101.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	66.32%	168.83%	-102.51%

TQQQ vs. LINT - Expense Ratio Comparison

TQQQ has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than LINT's 0.97% expense ratio.

Dividends

TQQQ vs. LINT - Dividend Comparison

TQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, more than LINT's 0.10% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	0.10%	0.25%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ	0.42%	0.65%	1.27%	1.26%	0.57%	0.00%	0.00%	0.06%	0.11%	0.00%	0.00%	0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TQQQ and LINT in my portfolio?

TQQQ and LINT have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TQQQ or LINT?

On fees, TQQQ is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TQQQ or LINT?

TQQQ is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for LINT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TQQQ or LINT?

TQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.42%, compared with 0.10% for LINT.

What is the main difference between TQQQ and LINT?

They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for TQQQ and 0.97% for LINT.