PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TQQQ vs. HOOG
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

TQQQ vs. HOOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) and Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

TQQQ vs. HOOG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
-17.87%70.98%
HOOG
Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF
-67.70%291.44%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TQQQ achieves a -17.87% return, which is significantly higher than HOOG's -67.70% return.


TQQQ

1D
3.72%
1M
-12.88%
YTD
-17.87%
6M
-17.28%
1Y
48.52%
3Y*
46.87%
5Y*
13.55%
10Y*
35.31%

HOOG

1D
2.51%
1M
-24.23%
YTD
-67.70%
6M
-82.07%
1Y
43.29%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TQQQ vs. HOOG - Expense Ratio Comparison

TQQQ has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than HOOG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

TQQQ vs. HOOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TQQQ
TQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
TQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
TQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
TQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
TQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

HOOG
HOOG Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
HOOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HOOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
HOOG Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
HOOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
HOOG Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TQQQ vs. HOOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) and Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TQQQHOOGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.72

0.30

+0.42

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.41

1.50

-0.09

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.18

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.41

0.53

+0.88

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.28

1.11

+3.17

TQQQ vs. HOOG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TQQQ Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is higher than the HOOG Sharpe Ratio of 0.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TQQQ and HOOG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TQQQHOOGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

0.30

+0.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.18

+0.47

Correlation

The correlation between TQQQ and HOOG is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

TQQQ vs. HOOG - Dividend Comparison

TQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, less than HOOG's 38.10% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
0.73%0.65%1.27%1.26%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.06%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.01%
HOOG
Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF
38.10%12.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

TQQQ vs. HOOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TQQQ drawdown since its inception was -81.66%, smaller than the maximum HOOG drawdown of -86.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TQQQ and HOOG.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


TQQQHOOGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.66%

-86.94%

+5.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.97%

-86.94%

+49.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-81.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-81.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-28.08%

-84.94%

+56.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.66%

-30.17%

+11.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.13%

41.37%

-29.24%

Volatility

TQQQ vs. HOOG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) is 19.74%, while Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG) has a volatility of 35.44%. This indicates that TQQQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HOOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


TQQQHOOGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.74%

35.44%

-15.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.50%

100.78%

-62.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

67.35%

143.11%

-75.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

66.53%

143.62%

-77.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

65.83%

143.62%

-77.79%