TQPAX vs. BRW
TQPAX (Touchstone Strategic Income Opportunities Fund) and BRW (Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Over the past 3 years, TQPAX returned 7.44%/yr vs 9.50%/yr for BRW. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TQPAX charges 1.00%/yr vs 1.71%/yr for BRW.
Performance
TQPAX vs. BRW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TQPAX achieves a 0.85% return, which is significantly lower than BRW's 3.21% return.
TQPAX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.49%
- 6M
- 0.54%
- YTD
- 0.85%
- 1Y
- 5.46%
- 3Y*
- 7.44%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BRW
- 1D
- -0.90%
- 1M
- 2.36%
- 6M
- 4.03%
- YTD
- 3.21%
- 1Y
- -5.76%
- 3Y*
- 9.50%
- 5Y*
- 7.01%
- 10Y*
- —
TQPAX vs. BRW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TQPAX Touchstone Strategic Income Opportunities Fund | 0.85% | 8.97% | 7.26% | 8.37% | -9.86% | -0.64% |
BRW Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund | 3.21% | 5.89% | 12.16% | 18.49% | -4.64% | 1.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between TQPAX and BRW is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2021 | 0.16 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TQPAX vs. BRW — Risk / Return Rank
TQPAX
BRW
TQPAX vs. BRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Touchstone Strategic Income Opportunities Fund (TQPAX) and Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund (BRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TQPAX | BRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 0.93 | +0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.28 | -0.33 | +2.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.85 | -0.55 | +8.41 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TQPAX vs. BRW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TQPAX drawdown since its inception was -16.94%, roughly equal to the maximum BRW drawdown of -17.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TQPAX and BRW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TQPAX | BRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.94% | -17.74% | +0.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.40% | -17.74% | +15.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.17% | -17.74% | +13.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.94% | -17.74% | +0.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.91% | -9.06% | +8.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.28% | -4.07% | -0.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.70% | 10.46% | -9.76% |
Volatility
TQPAX vs. BRW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Touchstone Strategic Income Opportunities Fund (TQPAX) is 1.09%, while Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund (BRW) has a volatility of 3.33%. This indicates that TQPAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BRW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TQPAX | BRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.09% | 3.33% | -2.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.72% | 8.44% | -5.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.73% | 13.48% | -9.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.10% | 12.95% | -7.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.10% | 12.87% | -7.77% |
TQPAX vs. BRW - Expense Ratio Comparison
TQPAX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than BRW's 1.71% expense ratio.
Dividends
TQPAX vs. BRW - Dividend Comparison
TQPAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.75%, less than BRW's 15.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRW Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund | 15.39% | 14.46% | 12.27% | 16.02% | 13.82% | 4.53% |
TQPAX Touchstone Strategic Income Opportunities Fund | 4.75% | 4.20% | 4.43% | 4.95% | 4.02% | 1.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TQPAX and BRW have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BRW has higher volatility (3.33%) compared to TQPAX (1.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TQPAX dropped -16.94% vs BRW's -17.74%.
TQPAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs -0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TQPAX and BRW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer