TQPAX vs. JMM
TQPAX (Touchstone Strategic Income Opportunities Fund) and JMM (Nuveen Multi-Market Income Fund) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Over the past 3 years, TQPAX returned 7.76%/yr vs 6.05%/yr for JMM. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TQPAX charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for JMM.
Performance
TQPAX vs. JMM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TQPAX achieves a 1.03% return, which is significantly higher than JMM's -0.95% return.
TQPAX
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- 0.74%
- YTD
- 1.03%
- 6M
- 1.44%
- 1Y
- 5.74%
- 3Y*
- 7.76%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JMM
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 1.16%
- YTD
- -0.95%
- 6M
- -0.78%
- 1Y
- -0.14%
- 3Y*
- 6.05%
- 5Y*
- 0.72%
- 10Y*
- 3.00%
TQPAX vs. JMM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TQPAX Touchstone Strategic Income Opportunities Fund | 1.03% | 8.97% | 7.26% | 8.37% | -9.86% | -0.64% |
JMM Nuveen Multi-Market Income Fund | -0.95% | 5.61% | 8.15% | 6.57% | -17.95% | 2.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between TQPAX and JMM is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2021 | 0.23 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TQPAX vs. JMM — Risk / Return Rank
TQPAX
JMM
TQPAX vs. JMM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Touchstone Strategic Income Opportunities Fund (TQPAX) and Nuveen Multi-Market Income Fund (JMM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TQPAX | JMM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.01 | +0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.54 | -0.02 | +2.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.82 | -0.03 | +8.86 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TQPAX vs. JMM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TQPAX drawdown since its inception was -16.94%, smaller than the maximum JMM drawdown of -48.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TQPAX and JMM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TQPAX | JMM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.94% | -48.15% | +31.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.40% | -8.28% | +5.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.17% | -9.92% | +5.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.19% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -26.48% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.59% | -5.93% | +5.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.33% | -14.09% | +9.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.69% | 4.14% | -3.45% |
Volatility
TQPAX vs. JMM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Touchstone Strategic Income Opportunities Fund (TQPAX) is 0.99%, while Nuveen Multi-Market Income Fund (JMM) has a volatility of 3.07%. This indicates that TQPAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JMM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TQPAX | JMM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.99% | 3.07% | -2.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.66% | 8.21% | -5.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.70% | 11.86% | -8.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.11% | 13.41% | -8.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.11% | 13.92% | -8.81% |
TQPAX vs. JMM - Expense Ratio Comparison
TQPAX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than JMM's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
TQPAX vs. JMM - Dividend Comparison
TQPAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.67%, less than JMM's 5.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JMM Nuveen Multi-Market Income Fund | 5.99% | 5.76% | 5.48% | 5.58% | 6.13% | 4.60% | 4.49% | 4.86% | 5.34% | 5.63% | 6.19% | 6.76% |
TQPAX Touchstone Strategic Income Opportunities Fund | 4.67% | 4.20% | 4.43% | 4.95% | 4.02% | 1.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TQPAX and JMM have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JMM has higher volatility (3.07%) compared to TQPAX (0.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TQPAX dropped -16.94% vs JMM's -48.15%.
TQPAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs -0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TQPAX and JMM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer