TPZ vs. PXJ
TPZ (Tortoise Electrification Infrastructure ETF) and PXJ (Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF) are both Energy Equities funds. TPZ is actively managed, while PXJ is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, TPZ returned 8.71%/yr vs -1.29%/yr for PXJ. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TPZ charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.63%/yr for PXJ.
Performance
TPZ vs. PXJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TPZ achieves a 10.26% return, which is significantly lower than PXJ's 42.16% return. Over the past 10 years, TPZ has outperformed PXJ with an annualized return of 8.71%, while PXJ has yielded a comparatively lower -1.29% annualized return.
TPZ
- 1D
- -0.81%
- 1M
- 2.31%
- 6M
- 8.81%
- YTD
- 10.26%
- 1Y
- 12.99%
- 3Y*
- 25.29%
- 5Y*
- 17.99%
- 10Y*
- 8.71%
PXJ
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- -3.49%
- 6M
- 25.71%
- YTD
- 42.16%
- 1Y
- 72.98%
- 3Y*
- 18.54%
- 5Y*
- 22.10%
- 10Y*
- -1.29%
TPZ vs. PXJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TPZ Tortoise Electrification Infrastructure ETF | 10.26% | 5.67% | 53.88% | 20.72% | 2.44% | 29.31% | -27.84% | 15.61% | -16.12% | -0.30% |
PXJ Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF | 42.16% | 8.74% | 0.21% | 14.44% | 62.25% | 11.28% | -44.31% | -0.32% | -39.82% | -23.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between TPZ and PXJ is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2009 | 0.49 |
The correlation between TPZ and PXJ shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (1 year) to 0.53 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TPZ vs. PXJ — Risk / Return Rank
TPZ
PXJ
TPZ vs. PXJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tortoise Electrification Infrastructure ETF (TPZ) and Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF (PXJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TPZ | PXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.43 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.07 | 3.99 | -1.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.58 | 14.12 | -9.53 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TPZ vs. PXJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TPZ drawdown since its inception was -78.17%, smaller than the maximum PXJ drawdown of -94.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPZ and PXJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TPZ | PXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.17% | -94.82% | +16.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.29% | -18.39% | +12.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.78% | -40.03% | +22.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.78% | -40.03% | +22.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -77.04% | -87.72% | +10.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.62% | -67.52% | +64.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.88% | -55.73% | +43.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.84% | 5.19% | -2.35% |
Volatility
TPZ vs. PXJ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Tortoise Electrification Infrastructure ETF (TPZ) is 3.93%, while Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF (PXJ) has a volatility of 8.40%. This indicates that TPZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PXJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TPZ | PXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.93% | 8.40% | -4.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.82% | 19.22% | -8.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.79% | 26.67% | -12.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.69% | 34.30% | -16.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.70% | 39.19% | -11.49% |
TPZ vs. PXJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
TPZ has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than PXJ's 0.63% expense ratio.
Dividends
TPZ vs. PXJ - Dividend Comparison
TPZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.69%, more than PXJ's 2.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PXJ Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF | 2.45% | 2.91% | 3.34% | 1.99% | 0.65% | 2.40% | 4.72% | 1.87% | 0.99% | 2.75% | 1.18% | 2.36% |
TPZ Tortoise Electrification Infrastructure ETF | 3.69% | 3.99% | 5.88% | 8.99% | 9.52% | 4.77% | 8.80% | 8.84% | 9.41% | 7.28% | 6.88% | 9.68% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TPZ and PXJ have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PXJ has higher volatility (8.40%) compared to TPZ (3.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TPZ dropped -78.17% vs PXJ's -94.82%.
On 10-year performance, TPZ leads with 8.71% vs -1.29% for PXJ. On fees, PXJ is cheaper at 0.63% per year. On volatility, TPZ has been the lower-risk option at 3.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, TPZ has performed better with a 8.71% return vs -1.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PXJ is cheaper with a 0.63% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for TPZ.
TPZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.69%, compared with 2.45% for PXJ.
They also come from different issuers: Tortoise and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for TPZ and 0.63% for PXJ.
PXJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.77 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TPZ and PXJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer