TPSA.AS vs. XHLF
TPSA.AS (iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and XHLF (BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TPSA.AS is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Gbl Infl Linked US TIPS TR USD, while XHLF is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Treasury 6 Month Duration Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, TPSA.AS returned 1.06%/yr vs 1.83%/yr for XHLF. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TPSA.AS charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for XHLF.
Performance
TPSA.AS vs. XHLF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
TPSA.AS is traded in EUR, while XHLF is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XHLF values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with TPSA.AS having a 2.53% return and XHLF slightly higher at 2.55%.
TPSA.AS
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 0.70%
- YTD
- 2.53%
- 6M
- 1.56%
- 1Y
- 3.01%
- 3Y*
- 1.06%
- 5Y*
- 1.90%
- 10Y*
- 2.38%
XHLF
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 0.91%
- YTD
- 2.55%
- 6M
- 1.97%
- 1Y
- 2.17%
- 3Y*
- 1.83%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TPSA.AS vs. XHLF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TPSA.AS iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 2.53% | -5.59% | 8.47% | 0.33% | -9.33% |
XHLF BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF | 2.55% | -8.16% | 11.98% | 1.76% | -5.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between TPSA.AS and XHLF is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2022 | 0.55 |
The correlation between TPSA.AS and XHLF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TPSA.AS vs. XHLF — Risk / Return Rank
TPSA.AS
XHLF
TPSA.AS vs. XHLF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (TPSA.AS) and BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XHLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TPSA.AS | XHLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.06 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.77 | 0.57 | +0.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.95 | 1.32 | +0.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TPSA.AS | XHLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 | 0.35 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.04 | +0.42 |
Drawdowns
TPSA.AS vs. XHLF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TPSA.AS drawdown since its inception was -19.92%, which is greater than XHLF's maximum drawdown of -11.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPSA.AS and XHLF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TPSA.AS | XHLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.92% | -11.96% | -7.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.97% | -3.83% | -0.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.93% | -11.55% | +0.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.19% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.80% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.08% | -6.90% | -1.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.59% | -6.71% | +0.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.58% | 1.65% | -0.07% |
Volatility
TPSA.AS vs. XHLF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (TPSA.AS) is 0.89%, while BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XHLF) has a volatility of 1.28%. This indicates that TPSA.AS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XHLF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TPSA.AS | XHLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.89% | 1.28% | -0.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.83% | 4.30% | -0.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.86% | 6.23% | -0.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.38% | 7.58% | +0.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.15% | 7.58% | +0.57% |
TPSA.AS vs. XHLF - Expense Ratio Comparison
TPSA.AS has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than XHLF's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
TPSA.AS vs. XHLF - Dividend Comparison
TPSA.AS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XHLF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.85%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TPSA.AS iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XHLF BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF | 3.85% | 3.98% | 4.96% | 4.50% | 0.86% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TPSA.AS and XHLF have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XHLF is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XHLF is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for TPSA.AS.
TPSA.AS is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while XHLF is Government Bonds. TPSA.AS tracks Bloomberg Gbl Infl Linked US TIPS TR USD, while XHLF tracks Bloomberg US Treasury 6 Month Duration Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and BondBloxx. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for TPSA.AS and 0.03% for XHLF.
Find the right allocation for TPSA.AS and XHLF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer