TPSA.AS vs. ITPS.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (TPSA.AS) and iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ITPS.L).
TPSA.AS and ITPS.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. TPSA.AS is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Gbl Infl Linked US TIPS TR USD. It was launched on Dec 8, 2006. ITPS.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Gbl Infl Linked US TIPS TR USD. It was launched on Dec 8, 2006. Both TPSA.AS and ITPS.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: TPSA.AS or ITPS.L.
Correlation
The correlation between TPSA.AS and ITPS.L is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
TPSA.AS vs. ITPS.L - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
TPSA.AS:
0.75
ITPS.L:
0.50
TPSA.AS:
1.10
ITPS.L:
0.78
TPSA.AS:
1.15
ITPS.L:
1.09
TPSA.AS:
0.44
ITPS.L:
0.18
TPSA.AS:
5.21
ITPS.L:
2.50
TPSA.AS:
1.03%
ITPS.L:
1.43%
TPSA.AS:
7.08%
ITPS.L:
7.20%
TPSA.AS:
-19.97%
ITPS.L:
-37.27%
TPSA.AS:
-6.70%
ITPS.L:
-16.28%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TPSA.AS achieves a -1.74% return, which is significantly lower than ITPS.L's -0.31% return. Over the past 10 years, TPSA.AS has underperformed ITPS.L with an annualized return of 2.34%, while ITPS.L has yielded a comparatively higher 3.98% annualized return.
TPSA.AS
-1.74%
-3.15%
2.85%
5.02%
1.96%
2.34%
ITPS.L
-0.31%
-2.16%
2.44%
3.04%
1.26%
3.98%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TPSA.AS vs. ITPS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both TPSA.AS and ITPS.L have an expense ratio of 0.12%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
TPSA.AS vs. ITPS.L — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
TPSA.AS
ITPS.L
TPSA.AS vs. ITPS.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (TPSA.AS) and iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ITPS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
TPSA.AS vs. ITPS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither TPSA.AS nor ITPS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
TPSA.AS vs. ITPS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TPSA.AS drawdown since its inception was -19.97%, smaller than the maximum ITPS.L drawdown of -37.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPSA.AS and ITPS.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
TPSA.AS vs. ITPS.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (TPSA.AS) has a higher volatility of 2.82% compared to iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ITPS.L) at 2.34%. This indicates that TPSA.AS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ITPS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.