TPRY vs. QYLD
TPRY (VistaShares Target 15 TEPRTantrum Contrarian Distribution ETF) and QYLD (Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TPRY is a Derivative Income fund tracking the BITA VistaShares TEPRTantrum Select, while QYLD is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TPRY charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for QYLD.
Performance
TPRY vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TPRY
- 1D
- -4.10%
- 1M
- -2.22%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QYLD
- 1D
- -1.97%
- 1M
- 1.41%
- YTD
- 7.89%
- 6M
- 7.59%
- 1Y
- 22.55%
- 3Y*
- 13.99%
- 5Y*
- 8.26%
- 10Y*
- 9.99%
TPRY vs. QYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TPRY VistaShares Target 15 TEPRTantrum Contrarian Distribution ETF | 3.52% |
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF | 5.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between TPRY and QYLD is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2026 | 0.83 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TPRY vs. QYLD — Risk / Return Rank
TPRY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QYLD
TPRY vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VistaShares Target 15 TEPRTantrum Contrarian Distribution ETF (TPRY) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TPRY | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.52 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.56 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 25.38 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TPRY vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TPRY drawdown since its inception was -11.32%, smaller than the maximum QYLD drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPRY and QYLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TPRY | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.32% | -24.75% | +13.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -4.97% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.61% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -24.75% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.10% | -2.10% | -2.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.27% | -3.82% | +0.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.89% | — |
Volatility
TPRY vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TPRY | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.78% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.50% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.61% | 9.70% | +17.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.61% | 14.84% | +12.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.61% | 15.56% | +12.05% |
TPRY vs. QYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
TPRY has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than QYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
TPRY vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison
TPRY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.67%, less than QYLD's 11.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF | 11.68% | 11.55% | 12.50% | 11.78% | 13.75% | 12.85% | 11.16% | 9.84% | 12.44% | 7.69% | 9.15% | 9.42% |
TPRY VistaShares Target 15 TEPRTantrum Contrarian Distribution ETF | 3.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TPRY and QYLD have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QYLD is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QYLD is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TPRY.
QYLD has the higher dividend yield at 11.68%, compared with 3.67% for TPRY.
TPRY is categorized as Derivative Income, while QYLD is Nasdaq-100. TPRY tracks BITA VistaShares TEPRTantrum Select, while QYLD tracks CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2. They also come from different issuers: VistaShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for TPRY and 0.60% for QYLD.
Find the right allocation for TPRY and QYLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer