TPR vs. RMD
TPR (Tapestry, Inc.) and RMD (ResMed Inc.) are both stocks. TPR operates in Luxury Goods (Consumer Cyclical), while RMD operates in Medical Instruments & Supplies (Healthcare). Over the past 10 years, TPR returned 17.11%/yr vs 13.71%/yr for RMD. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TPR vs. RMD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TPR achieves a 10.89% return, which is significantly higher than RMD's -19.39% return. Over the past 10 years, TPR has outperformed RMD with an annualized return of 17.11%, while RMD has yielded a comparatively lower 13.71% annualized return.
TPR
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- 5.86%
- YTD
- 10.89%
- 6M
- 20.82%
- 1Y
- 80.77%
- 3Y*
- 52.54%
- 5Y*
- 29.87%
- 10Y*
- 17.11%
RMD
- 1D
- -1.48%
- 1M
- -6.31%
- YTD
- -19.39%
- 6M
- -22.35%
- 1Y
- -22.67%
- 3Y*
- -2.34%
- 5Y*
- -0.97%
- 10Y*
- 13.71%
TPR vs. RMD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TPR Tapestry, Inc. | 10.89% | 98.73% | 82.80% | 0.16% | -3.32% | 32.29% | 16.86% | -15.97% | -22.09% | 30.48% |
RMD ResMed Inc. | -19.39% | 6.26% | 34.18% | -16.55% | -19.47% | 23.41% | 38.33% | 37.85% | 36.38% | 39.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between TPR and RMD is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2000 | 0.28 |
Fundamentals
TPR:
$3.15
RMD:
$13.78
TPR:
44.72
RMD:
14.02
TPR:
3.78
RMD:
3.85
TPR:
$7.85B
RMD:
$5.54B
TPR:
$5.98B
RMD:
$3.42B
TPR:
$1.06B
RMD:
$2.10B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TPR vs. RMD — Risk / Return Rank
TPR
RMD
TPR vs. RMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tapestry, Inc. (TPR) and ResMed Inc. (RMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TPR | RMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 0.85 | +0.51 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.23 | -0.61 | +4.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.73 | -1.42 | +12.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TPR | RMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.99 | -0.95 | +2.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 | -0.03 | +0.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 | 0.44 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.52 | -0.08 |
Drawdowns
TPR vs. RMD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TPR drawdown since its inception was -82.55%, which is greater than RMD's maximum drawdown of -61.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPR and RMD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TPR | RMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.55% | -61.61% | -20.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.21% | -37.28% | +18.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.54% | -40.09% | +0.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.87% | -53.99% | +12.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -79.06% | -53.99% | -25.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.72% | -33.74% | +22.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.74% | -15.98% | -11.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.55% | 15.95% | -8.40% |
Volatility
TPR vs. RMD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Tapestry, Inc. (TPR) is 8.83%, while ResMed Inc. (RMD) has a volatility of 10.44%. This indicates that TPR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RMD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TPR | RMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.83% | 10.44% | -1.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.95% | 19.50% | +8.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.87% | 23.97% | +16.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.24% | 31.12% | +9.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.23% | 31.55% | +12.68% |
Dividends
TPR vs. RMD - Dividend Comparison
TPR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, less than RMD's 1.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RMD ResMed Inc. | 1.24% | 0.94% | 0.88% | 1.07% | 0.83% | 0.62% | 0.73% | 0.98% | 1.26% | 1.61% | 2.03% | 2.16% |
TPR Tapestry, Inc. | 1.14% | 1.17% | 2.14% | 3.53% | 2.89% | 1.23% | 1.09% | 5.01% | 3.00% | 3.06% | 3.85% | 4.13% |
Financials
TPR vs. RMD - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Tapestry, Inc. and ResMed Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
TPR vs. RMD - Profitability Comparison
TPR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tapestry, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.48B and revenue of 1.92B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 76.9%.
RMD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ResMed Inc. reported a gross profit of 890.98M and revenue of 1.43B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 62.3%.
TPR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tapestry, Inc. reported an operating income of 427.50M and revenue of 1.92B, resulting in an operating margin of 22.3%.
RMD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ResMed Inc. reported an operating income of 499.81M and revenue of 1.43B, resulting in an operating margin of 34.9%.
TPR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tapestry, Inc. reported a net income of 343.80M and revenue of 1.92B, resulting in a net margin of 17.9%.
RMD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ResMed Inc. reported a net income of 398.73M and revenue of 1.43B, resulting in a net margin of 27.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
TPR and RMD have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RMD has higher volatility (10.44%) compared to TPR (8.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TPR dropped -82.55% vs RMD's -61.61%.
TPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs -0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TPR and RMD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer