TPR vs. CROX
TPR (Tapestry, Inc.) and CROX (Crocs, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Cyclical sector — TPR in Luxury Goods, CROX in Footwear & Accessories. Over the past 10 years, TPR returned 16.90%/yr vs 27.82%/yr for CROX. Their 0.43 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
TPR vs. CROX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TPR achieves a 19.91% return, which is significantly lower than CROX's 49.68% return. Over the past 10 years, TPR has underperformed CROX with an annualized return of 16.90%, while CROX has yielded a comparatively higher 27.82% annualized return.
TPR
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 5.66%
- 6M
- 20.73%
- YTD
- 19.91%
- 1Y
- 45.17%
- 3Y*
- 56.38%
- 5Y*
- 32.61%
- 10Y*
- 16.90%
- ALL TIME*
- 19.15%
CROX
- 1D
- 3.52%
- 1M
- 2.18%
- 6M
- 52.54%
- YTD
- 49.68%
- 1Y
- 31.79%
- 3Y*
- 6.16%
- 5Y*
- -1.18%
- 10Y*
- 27.82%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.04%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
CROX Crocs, Inc. | $148.57M | $138.42M | $140.14M |
| $281.88M | $316.68M | $378.92M |
TPR vs. CROX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TPR Tapestry, Inc. | 19.91% | 98.73% | 82.80% | 0.16% | -3.32% | 32.29% | 16.86% | -15.97% | -22.09% | 30.48% |
CROX Crocs, Inc. | 49.68% | -21.92% | 17.26% | -13.85% | -15.43% | 104.63% | 49.58% | 61.24% | 105.54% | 84.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between TPR and CROX is 0.41, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.40 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.50 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2006 | 0.43 |
The correlation between TPR and CROX shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (3 years) to 0.50 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
TPR:
$30.79B
CROX:
$6.36B
TPR:
$3.14
CROX:
$11.49
TPR:
48.55
CROX:
11.14
TPR:
4.10
CROX:
1.63
TPR:
46.51
CROX:
4.64
TPR:
$7.85B
CROX:
$4.05B
TPR:
$5.98B
CROX:
$2.33B
TPR:
$1.06B
CROX:
$803.31M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TPR vs. CROX — Risk / Return Rank
TPR
CROX
TPR vs. CROX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tapestry, Inc. (TPR) and Crocs, Inc. (CROX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TPR | CROX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.16 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.24 | 0.94 | +1.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.13 | 1.67 | +3.46 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TPR vs. CROX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TPR drawdown since its inception was -82.55%, smaller than the maximum CROX drawdown of -98.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPR and CROX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TPR | CROX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.55% | -98.74% | +16.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.21% | -30.19% | +10.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.59% | -54.04% | +17.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.87% | -73.86% | +31.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -79.06% | -75.18% | -3.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.53% | -29.11% | +24.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.63% | -61.08% | +33.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.38% | 17.03% | -8.65% |
Volatility
TPR vs. CROX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Tapestry, Inc. (TPR) is 9.81%, while Crocs, Inc. (CROX) has a volatility of 12.53%. This indicates that TPR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CROX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TPR | CROX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.81% | 12.53% | -2.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.23% | 34.08% | -4.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.83% | 53.56% | -12.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.20% | 55.25% | -15.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.30% | 56.03% | -11.73% |
Dividends
TPR vs. CROX - Dividend Comparison
TPR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, while CROX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CROX Crocs, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TPR Tapestry, Inc. | 1.05% | 1.17% | 2.14% | 3.53% | 2.89% | 1.23% | 1.09% | 5.01% | 3.00% | 3.06% | 3.85% | 4.13% |
Financials
TPR vs. CROX - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Tapestry, Inc. and Crocs, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
TPR vs. CROX - Profitability Comparison
TPR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Tapestry, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.48B and revenue of 1.92B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 76.9%.
CROX - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Crocs, Inc. reported a gross profit of 700.71M and revenue of 1.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.4%.
TPR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Tapestry, Inc. reported an operating income of 427.50M and revenue of 1.92B, resulting in an operating margin of 22.3%.
CROX - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Crocs, Inc. reported an operating income of 285.68M and revenue of 1.18B, resulting in an operating margin of 24.2%.
TPR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Tapestry, Inc. reported a net income of 343.80M and revenue of 1.92B, resulting in a net margin of 17.9%.
CROX - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Crocs, Inc. reported a net income of 204.89M and revenue of 1.18B, resulting in a net margin of 17.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
TPR and CROX have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CROX has higher volatility (12.53%) compared to TPR (9.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TPR dropped -82.55% vs CROX's -98.74%.
TPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.05 vs 0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TPR and CROX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer