PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TPR vs. LECO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TPR vs. LECO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tapestry, Inc. (TPR) and Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. (LECO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TPR achieves a 16.02% return, which is significantly higher than LECO's 8.12% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with TPR having a 17.77% annualized return and LECO not far ahead at 17.79%.


TPR

1D
1.40%
1M
11.41%
YTD
16.02%
6M
20.31%
1Y
81.65%
3Y*
54.16%
5Y*
30.52%
10Y*
17.77%

LECO

1D
0.19%
1M
-2.64%
YTD
8.12%
6M
6.64%
1Y
28.05%
3Y*
11.30%
5Y*
16.64%
10Y*
17.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TPR vs. LECO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TPR
Tapestry, Inc.
16.02%98.73%82.80%0.16%-3.32%32.29%16.86%-15.97%-22.09%30.48%
LECO
Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.
8.12%29.63%-12.55%52.61%5.42%21.89%22.97%25.41%-12.24%21.37%

Correlation

The correlation between TPR and LECO is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2000

0.42

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TPR:

$30.71B

LECO:

$14.29B

EPS

TPR:

$3.15

LECO:

$9.68

PE Ratio

TPR:

46.79

LECO:

26.67

PS Ratio

TPR:

3.95

LECO:

3.30

PB Ratio

TPR:

45.00

LECO:

9.45

Total Revenue (TTM)

TPR:

$7.85B

LECO:

$4.35B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TPR:

$5.98B

LECO:

$1.57B

EBITDA (TTM)

TPR:

$1.06B

LECO:

$807.88M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TPR vs. LECO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TPR
TPR Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
TPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
TPR Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
TPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
TPR Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

LECO
LECO Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
LECO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LECO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
LECO Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
LECO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
LECO Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TPR vs. LECO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tapestry, Inc. (TPR) and Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. (LECO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TPRLECODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.20

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.27

1.40

+2.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.72

3.68

+7.04

TPR vs. LECO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TPR Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is higher than the LECO Sharpe Ratio of 1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TPR and LECO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TPR vs. LECO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TPR drawdown since its inception was -82.55%, which is greater than LECO's maximum drawdown of -68.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPR and LECO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TPRLECODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.55%

-68.89%

-13.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.21%

-20.09%

+0.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.54%

-34.29%

-5.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.87%

-34.29%

-7.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-79.06%

-38.89%

-40.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.63%

-13.31%

+5.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.73%

-13.51%

-14.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.64%

7.64%

0.00%

Volatility

TPR vs. LECO - Volatility Comparison

Tapestry, Inc. (TPR) has a higher volatility of 10.14% compared to Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. (LECO) at 8.61%. This indicates that TPR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LECO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TPRLECODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.14%

8.61%

+1.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.47%

20.20%

+8.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

41.12%

27.05%

+14.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.26%

26.66%

+13.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.25%

27.43%

+16.82%

Dividends

TPR vs. LECO - Dividend Comparison

TPR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, less than LECO's 1.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LECO
Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.
1.19%1.27%1.54%1.21%1.61%1.50%1.70%1.96%2.08%1.57%1.71%2.29%
TPR
Tapestry, Inc.
1.09%1.17%2.14%3.53%2.89%1.23%1.09%5.01%3.00%3.06%3.85%4.13%

Financials

TPR vs. LECO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Tapestry, Inc. and Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B20222023202420252026
1.92B
1.12B
(TPR) Total Revenue
(LECO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

TPR vs. LECO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Tapestry, Inc. and Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
76.9%
35.6%
Portfolio components
TPR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tapestry, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.48B and revenue of 1.92B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 76.9%.

LECO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 399.13M and revenue of 1.12B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.6%.

TPR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tapestry, Inc. reported an operating income of 427.50M and revenue of 1.92B, resulting in an operating margin of 22.3%.

LECO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 186.16M and revenue of 1.12B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.6%.

TPR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tapestry, Inc. reported a net income of 343.80M and revenue of 1.92B, resulting in a net margin of 17.9%.

LECO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 136.38M and revenue of 1.12B, resulting in a net margin of 12.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


TPR and LECO have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TPR has higher volatility (10.14%) compared to LECO (8.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TPR dropped -82.55% vs LECO's -68.89%.

TPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TPR and LECO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer