PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TPOR vs. QTJL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TPOR vs. QTJL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Transportation Bull 3X Shares (TPOR) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TPOR achieves a 30.85% return, which is significantly higher than QTJL's 2.56% return.


TPOR

1D
-0.03%
1M
-11.11%
6M
22.45%
YTD
30.85%
1Y
71.71%
3Y*
4.30%
5Y*
1.96%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
6.83%

QTJL

1D
0.93%
1M
-1.97%
6M
1.77%
YTD
2.56%
1Y
11.97%
3Y*
15.99%
5Y*
9.06%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$200.88K$354.66K$247.25K
$962.17K$1.03M$940.74K

TPOR vs. QTJL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
TPOR
Direxion Daily Transportation Bull 3X Shares
30.85%3.26%-9.12%54.60%-58.70%27.33%
QTJL
Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July
2.56%21.07%16.50%42.39%-30.16%9.36%

Correlation

The correlation between TPOR and QTJL is 0.42, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2021

0.58

The correlation between TPOR and QTJL shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (1 year) to 0.58 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TPOR vs. QTJL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TPOR
TPOR Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
TPOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TPOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
TPOR Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
TPOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
TPOR Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

QTJL
QTJL Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
QTJL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTJL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTJL Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
QTJL Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTJL Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TPOR vs. QTJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Transportation Bull 3X Shares (TPOR) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TPORQTJLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.18

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.81

1.23

+0.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.57

6.04

-0.47

TPOR vs. QTJL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TPOR Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is comparable to the QTJL Sharpe Ratio of 0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TPOR and QTJL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TPOR vs. QTJL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TPOR drawdown since its inception was -87.59%, which is greater than QTJL's maximum drawdown of -33.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPOR and QTJL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TPORQTJLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.59%

-33.40%

-54.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.00%

-8.48%

-25.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-64.11%

-22.43%

-41.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-74.08%

-33.40%

-40.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-30.25%

-4.62%

-25.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.45%

-7.74%

-30.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.04%

1.73%

+9.31%

Volatility

TPOR vs. QTJL - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily Transportation Bull 3X Shares (TPOR) has a higher volatility of 13.31% compared to Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL) at 6.45%. This indicates that TPOR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTJL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TPORQTJLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.31%

6.45%

+6.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

46.89%

9.63%

+37.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

59.38%

11.72%

+47.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

67.86%

20.43%

+47.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

70.74%

20.30%

+50.44%

TPOR vs. QTJL - Expense Ratio Comparison

TPOR has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than QTJL's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

TPOR vs. QTJL - Dividend Comparison

TPOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, while QTJL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
QTJL
Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TPOR
Direxion Daily Transportation Bull 3X Shares
0.57%0.91%1.43%1.51%0.00%0.00%0.10%0.96%1.22%8.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


TPOR and QTJL have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TPOR has higher volatility (13.31%) compared to QTJL (6.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TPOR dropped -87.59% vs QTJL's -33.40%.

On 5-year performance, QTJL leads with 9.06% vs 1.96% for TPOR. On fees, QTJL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, QTJL has been the lower-risk option at 6.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QTJL has performed better with a 9.06% return vs 1.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QTJL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for TPOR.

TPOR has the higher dividend yield at 0.57%, compared with 0.00% for QTJL.

They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for TPOR and 0.79% for QTJL.

TPOR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.04 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TPOR and QTJL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer