TPOR vs. FLYU

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

TPOR (Direxion Daily Transportation Bull 3X Shares) and FLYU (MicroSectors Travel 3X Leveraged ETNs) are both Leveraged Equities funds - TPOR tracks the Dow Jones Transportation Average Index (300%) while FLYU tracks the MerQube MicroSectors U.S. Travel Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, TPOR returned 18.15%/yr vs 4.85%/yr for FLYU. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TPOR charges 1.01%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for FLYU.

Performance

TPOR vs. FLYU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Transportation Bull 3X Shares (TPOR) and MicroSectors Travel 3X Leveraged ETNs (FLYU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TPOR achieves a 40.67% return, which is significantly higher than FLYU's -18.15% return.

TPOR

• 1D: 2.38%
• 1M: 28.62%
• YTD: 40.67%
• 6M: 30.62%
• 1Y: 82.15%
• 3Y*: 18.15%
• 5Y*: -0.40%
• 10Y*: —

FLYU

• 1D: 2.56%
• 1M: 19.09%
• YTD: -18.15%
• 6M: -16.93%
• 1Y: 1.53%
• 3Y*: 4.85%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TPOR vs. FLYU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
TPOR Direxion Daily Transportation Bull 3X Shares	40.67%	3.26%	-9.12%	54.60%	-5.22%
FLYU MicroSectors Travel 3X Leveraged ETNs	-18.15%	-2.29%	33.00%	111.16%	-19.09%

Correlation

The correlation between TPOR and FLYU is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2022	0.80

The correlation between TPOR and FLYU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

TPOR vs. FLYU - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TPOR	FLYU
Industrials	83.3%	17.7%
Technology	16.7%	16.4%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	13.2%
Consumer Cyclical	-	52.6%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	0.1%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

TPOR vs. FLYU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TPOR

TPOR Risk / Return Rank: 46
TPOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
TPOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
TPOR Omega Ratio Rank: 41
TPOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
TPOR Martin Ratio Rank: 47

FLYU

FLYU Risk / Return Rank: 11
FLYU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
FLYU Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
FLYU Omega Ratio Rank: 14
FLYU Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
FLYU Martin Ratio Rank: 10

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TPOR vs. FLYU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Transportation Bull 3X Shares (TPOR) and MicroSectors Travel 3X Leveraged ETNs (FLYU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TPOR	FLYU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.37	0.02	+1.35
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.94	0.59	+1.35
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.07	+0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.43	0.03	+2.40
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.93	0.06	+6.87

TPOR vs. FLYU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TPOR Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is higher than the FLYU Sharpe Ratio of 0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TPOR and FLYU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TPOR vs. FLYU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TPOR drawdown since its inception was -87.59%, which is greater than FLYU's maximum drawdown of -69.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPOR and FLYU.

Drawdown Indicators

	TPOR	FLYU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-87.59%	-69.00%	-18.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-34.00%	-52.33%	+18.33%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-64.11%	-69.00%	+4.89%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-74.08%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-25.02%	-35.07%	+10.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-38.65%	-26.53%	-12.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.91%	25.05%	-13.14%

Volatility

TPOR vs. FLYU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily Transportation Bull 3X Shares (TPOR) is 18.63%, while MicroSectors Travel 3X Leveraged ETNs (FLYU) has a volatility of 23.60%. This indicates that TPOR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLYU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TPOR	FLYU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.63%	23.60%	-4.97%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	46.21%	59.07%	-12.86%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	60.44%	75.07%	-14.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	67.98%	83.21%	-15.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	70.97%	83.21%	-12.24%

TPOR vs. FLYU - Expense Ratio Comparison

TPOR has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than FLYU's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

TPOR vs. FLYU - Dividend Comparison

TPOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, while FLYU has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLYU MicroSectors Travel 3X Leveraged ETNs	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TPOR Direxion Daily Transportation Bull 3X Shares	0.65%	0.91%	1.43%	1.51%	0.00%	0.00%	0.10%	0.96%	1.22%	8.70%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TPOR and FLYU in my portfolio?

TPOR and FLYU have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TPOR or FLYU?

FLYU has higher volatility (23.60%) compared to TPOR (18.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TPOR dropped -87.59% vs FLYU's -69.00%.

Which ETF is better, TPOR or FLYU?

On 3-year performance, TPOR leads with 18.15% vs 4.85% for FLYU. On fees, FLYU is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, TPOR has been the lower-risk option at 18.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TPOR or FLYU?

Over the 3-year period, TPOR has performed better with a 18.15% return vs 4.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TPOR or FLYU?

FLYU is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for TPOR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TPOR or FLYU?

TPOR has the higher dividend yield at 0.65%, compared with 0.00% for FLYU.

What is the main difference between TPOR and FLYU?

TPOR tracks Dow Jones Transportation Average Index (300%), while FLYU tracks MerQube MicroSectors U.S. Travel Index. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and REX. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for TPOR and 0.95% for FLYU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TPOR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs 0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.