TPOR vs. CIFG

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

TPOR (Direxion Daily Transportation Bull 3X Shares) and CIFG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. TPOR is passively managed, while CIFG is actively managed. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TPOR charges 1.01%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for CIFG.

Performance

TPOR vs. CIFG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Transportation Bull 3X Shares (TPOR) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF (CIFG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TPOR achieves a 28.21% return, which is significantly lower than CIFG's 96.56% return.

TPOR

• 1D: -2.19%
• 1M: 7.81%
• YTD: 28.21%
• 6M: 23.96%
• 1Y: 67.02%
• 3Y*: 13.97%
• 5Y*: -0.87%
• 10Y*: —

CIFG

• 1D: -3.87%
• 1M: 42.24%
• YTD: 96.56%
• 6M: 67.07%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TPOR vs. CIFG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TPOR Direxion Daily Transportation Bull 3X Shares	28.21%	-5.00%
CIFG Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF	96.56%	-32.52%

Correlation

The correlation between TPOR and CIFG is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025	0.32

Return for Risk

TPOR vs. CIFG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TPOR

TPOR Risk / Return Rank: 36
TPOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
TPOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
TPOR Omega Ratio Rank: 33
TPOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
TPOR Martin Ratio Rank: 38

CIFG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TPOR vs. CIFG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Transportation Bull 3X Shares (TPOR) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF (CIFG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TPOR	CIFG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.11	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.70	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.98	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.63	—	—

Drawdowns

TPOR vs. CIFG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TPOR drawdown since its inception was -87.59%, which is greater than CIFG's maximum drawdown of -71.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPOR and CIFG.

Drawdown Indicators

	TPOR	CIFG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-87.59%	-71.71%	-15.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-34.00%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-64.11%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-74.08%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-31.66%	-10.44%	-21.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-38.63%	-35.54%	-3.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.94%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TPOR	CIFG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	20.81%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	47.27%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	60.65%	205.93%	-145.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	68.03%	205.93%	-137.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	70.97%	205.93%	-134.96%

TPOR vs. CIFG - Expense Ratio Comparison

TPOR has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than CIFG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

TPOR vs. CIFG - Dividend Comparison

TPOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.71%, while CIFG has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CIFG Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TPOR Direxion Daily Transportation Bull 3X Shares	0.71%	0.91%	1.43%	1.51%	0.00%	0.00%	0.10%	0.96%	1.22%	8.70%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TPOR and CIFG in my portfolio?

TPOR and CIFG have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TPOR or CIFG?

On fees, CIFG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TPOR or CIFG?

CIFG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for TPOR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TPOR or CIFG?

TPOR has the higher dividend yield at 0.71%, compared with 0.00% for CIFG.

What is the main difference between TPOR and CIFG?

They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for TPOR and 0.75% for CIFG.