TPLNX vs. CSMDX
TPLNX (Timothy Plan Small Cap Value Fund) and CSMDX (Copeland SMID Cap Dividend Growth Fund) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, TPLNX returned 4.75%/yr vs 4.81%/yr for CSMDX. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TPLNX charges 1.52%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for CSMDX.
Performance
TPLNX vs. CSMDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TPLNX achieves a 8.11% return, which is significantly lower than CSMDX's 11.14% return.
TPLNX
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- -2.49%
- YTD
- 8.11%
- 6M
- 7.83%
- 1Y
- 16.24%
- 3Y*
- 11.27%
- 5Y*
- 4.75%
- 10Y*
- 9.01%
CSMDX
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.89%
- YTD
- 11.14%
- 6M
- 10.68%
- 1Y
- 17.70%
- 3Y*
- 8.32%
- 5Y*
- 4.81%
- 10Y*
- —
TPLNX vs. CSMDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TPLNX Timothy Plan Small Cap Value Fund | 8.11% | 0.58% | 11.18% | 17.31% | -13.13% | 28.12% | 2.00% | 28.29% | -15.66% | 10.87% |
CSMDX Copeland SMID Cap Dividend Growth Fund | 11.14% | 2.72% | 2.24% | 18.89% | -14.89% | 22.60% | 8.29% | 29.90% | -5.20% | 10.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between TPLNX and CSMDX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2017 | 0.91 |
The correlation between TPLNX and CSMDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TPLNX vs. CSMDX — Risk / Return Rank
TPLNX
CSMDX
TPLNX vs. CSMDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Timothy Plan Small Cap Value Fund (TPLNX) and Copeland SMID Cap Dividend Growth Fund (CSMDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TPLNX | CSMDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.94 | 1.20 | -0.25 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.53 | 1.87 | -0.34 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.21 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.53 | 1.82 | -0.30 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.14 | 5.59 | -1.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TPLNX | CSMDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 | 1.20 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 | 0.27 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.45 | -0.05 |
Drawdowns
TPLNX vs. CSMDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TPLNX drawdown since its inception was -55.96%, which is greater than CSMDX's maximum drawdown of -37.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPLNX and CSMDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TPLNX | CSMDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.96% | -37.28% | -18.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.04% | -9.20% | -0.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.49% | -24.60% | +1.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.75% | -24.60% | -1.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.18% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.45% | -1.05% | -2.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.73% | -5.78% | -2.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.70% | 3.00% | +0.70% |
Volatility
TPLNX vs. CSMDX - Volatility Comparison
Timothy Plan Small Cap Value Fund (TPLNX) has a higher volatility of 4.53% compared to Copeland SMID Cap Dividend Growth Fund (CSMDX) at 3.67%. This indicates that TPLNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSMDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TPLNX | CSMDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.53% | 3.67% | +0.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.47% | 10.23% | +1.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.97% | 14.48% | +2.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.53% | 18.16% | +2.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.13% | 19.17% | +2.96% |
TPLNX vs. CSMDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TPLNX has a 1.52% expense ratio, which is higher than CSMDX's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
TPLNX vs. CSMDX - Dividend Comparison
TPLNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.78%, more than CSMDX's 2.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSMDX Copeland SMID Cap Dividend Growth Fund | 2.83% | 3.14% | 1.33% | 0.81% | 4.07% | 6.67% | 0.38% | 2.61% | 4.40% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TPLNX Timothy Plan Small Cap Value Fund | 4.78% | 5.17% | 12.41% | 3.95% | 6.72% | 9.40% | 0.16% | 3.68% | 16.26% | 9.20% | 1.34% | 9.66% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, TPLNX and CSMDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
TPLNX has higher volatility (4.53%) compared to CSMDX (3.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TPLNX dropped -55.96% vs CSMDX's -37.28%.
CSMDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.20 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TPLNX and CSMDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer