TPLC vs. IWR
TPLC (Timothy Plan Fund Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core Fund) and IWR (iShares Russell Midcap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TPLC is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Victory U.S. Large Cap Volatility Weighted BRI Index, while IWR is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell Midcap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, TPLC returned 7.98%/yr vs 8.04%/yr for IWR. Their 0.96 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. TPLC charges 0.52%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for IWR.
Performance
TPLC vs. IWR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TPLC achieves a 11.20% return, which is significantly lower than IWR's 14.55% return.
TPLC
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- -0.50%
- 6M
- 7.18%
- YTD
- 11.20%
- 1Y
- 13.26%
- 3Y*
- 11.85%
- 5Y*
- 7.98%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 10.96%
IWR
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- -0.59%
- 6M
- 11.19%
- YTD
- 14.55%
- 1Y
- 20.25%
- 3Y*
- 14.75%
- 5Y*
- 8.04%
- 10Y*
- 11.43%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.95%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $186.41M | $266.84M | $222.00M | |
| $634.79K | $704.66K | $1.85M |
TPLC vs. IWR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TPLC Timothy Plan Fund Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core Fund | 11.20% | 7.08% | 13.10% | 15.17% | -12.58% | 26.34% | 14.55% | 8.32% |
IWR iShares Russell Midcap ETF | 14.55% | 10.37% | 15.21% | 17.05% | -17.48% | 22.44% | 16.93% | 7.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between TPLC and IWR is 0.94, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2019 | 0.96 |
The correlation between TPLC and IWR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
TPLC vs. IWR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TPLC
IWR
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Utilities
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Real Estate
Industrials
TPLC
IWR
Technology
TPLC
IWR
Financial Services
TPLC
IWR
Utilities
TPLC
IWR
Healthcare
TPLC
IWR
Consumer Cyclical
TPLC
IWR
Energy
TPLC
IWR
Basic Materials
TPLC
IWR
Consumer Defensive
TPLC
IWR
Communication Services
TPLC
IWR
Real Estate
TPLC
IWR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TPLC vs. IWR — Risk / Return Rank
TPLC
IWR
TPLC vs. IWR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Timothy Plan Fund Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core Fund (TPLC) and iShares Russell Midcap ETF (IWR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TPLC | IWR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.24 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.59 | 2.28 | -0.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.75 | 8.85 | -3.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TPLC vs. IWR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TPLC drawdown since its inception was -38.02%, smaller than the maximum IWR drawdown of -58.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPLC and IWR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TPLC | IWR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.02% | -58.78% | +20.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.58% | -8.17% | +0.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.18% | -21.09% | +2.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.63% | -26.18% | +4.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.31% | -0.93% | -0.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.20% | -7.76% | +2.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.09% | 2.10% | -0.01% |
Volatility
TPLC vs. IWR - Volatility Comparison
Timothy Plan Fund Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core Fund (TPLC) has a higher volatility of 2.63% compared to iShares Russell Midcap ETF (IWR) at 2.48%. This indicates that TPLC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TPLC | IWR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.63% | 2.48% | +0.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.37% | 10.17% | -1.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.58% | 13.67% | -2.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.12% | 18.22% | -2.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.73% | 19.31% | +0.42% |
TPLC vs. IWR - Expense Ratio Comparison
TPLC has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than IWR's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
TPLC vs. IWR - Dividend Comparison
TPLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, less than IWR's 1.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWR iShares Russell Midcap ETF | 1.16% | 1.29% | 1.27% | 1.43% | 1.59% | 1.04% | 1.28% | 1.43% | 1.98% | 1.52% | 1.72% | 1.59% |
TPLC Timothy Plan Fund Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core Fund | 0.83% | 0.89% | 0.88% | 0.89% | 1.06% | 0.61% | 0.81% | 0.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, TPLC and IWR move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
TPLC has higher volatility (2.63%) compared to IWR (2.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TPLC dropped -38.02% vs IWR's -58.78%.
On 5-year performance, IWR leads with 8.04% vs 7.98% for TPLC. On fees, IWR is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, IWR has been the lower-risk option at 2.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IWR has performed better with a 8.04% return vs 7.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IWR is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for TPLC.
IWR has the higher dividend yield at 1.16%, compared with 0.83% for TPLC.
TPLC is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while IWR is Mid Cap Blend Equities. TPLC tracks Victory U.S. Large Cap Volatility Weighted BRI Index, while IWR tracks Russell Midcap Index. They also come from different issuers: Timothy Plan and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for TPLC and 0.19% for IWR.
IWR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TPLC and IWR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer