PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TPLC vs. BIL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TPLC vs. BIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Timothy Plan Fund Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core Fund (TPLC) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TPLC achieves a 9.20% return, which is significantly higher than BIL's 1.67% return.


TPLC

1D
-0.50%
1M
1.50%
YTD
9.20%
6M
7.86%
1Y
12.87%
3Y*
13.44%
5Y*
8.34%
10Y*

BIL

1D
0.01%
1M
0.28%
YTD
1.67%
6M
1.76%
1Y
3.84%
3Y*
4.60%
5Y*
3.45%
10Y*
2.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TPLC vs. BIL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
TPLC
Timothy Plan Fund Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core Fund
9.20%7.08%13.10%15.17%-12.58%26.34%14.55%8.32%
BIL
SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
1.67%4.15%5.19%4.94%1.40%-0.10%0.40%1.29%

Correlation

The correlation between TPLC and BIL is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2019

-0.02

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TPLC vs. BIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TPLC
TPLC Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
TPLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TPLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
TPLC Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
TPLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
TPLC Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

BIL
BIL Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
BIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIL Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
BIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIL Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TPLC vs. BIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Timothy Plan Fund Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core Fund (TPLC) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TPLCBILDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-18.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-171.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

87.16

-85.97

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.70

352.24

-350.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.05

2,793.11

-2,787.06

TPLC vs. BIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TPLC Sharpe Ratio is 1.10, which is lower than the BIL Sharpe Ratio of 19.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TPLC and BIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TPLC vs. BIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TPLC drawdown since its inception was -38.02%, which is greater than BIL's maximum drawdown of -0.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPLC and BIL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TPLCBILDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.02%

-0.78%

-37.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.58%

-0.01%

-7.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.18%

-0.01%

-18.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.63%

-0.09%

-21.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-0.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.00%

0.00%

-1.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.26%

-0.26%

-5.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.13%

0.00%

+2.13%

Volatility

TPLC vs. BIL - Volatility Comparison

Timothy Plan Fund Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core Fund (TPLC) has a higher volatility of 3.45% compared to SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL) at 0.07%. This indicates that TPLC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TPLCBILDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.45%

0.07%

+3.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.72%

0.14%

+8.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.75%

0.20%

+11.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.16%

0.26%

+15.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.85%

0.26%

+19.59%

TPLC vs. BIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

TPLC has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than BIL's 0.14% expense ratio.


Dividends

TPLC vs. BIL - Dividend Comparison

TPLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, less than BIL's 3.85% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BIL
SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
3.85%4.13%5.03%4.92%1.35%0.00%0.30%2.05%1.66%0.68%0.07%
TPLC
Timothy Plan Fund Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core Fund
0.85%0.89%0.88%0.89%1.06%0.61%0.81%0.67%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TPLC and BIL have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TPLC has higher volatility (3.45%) compared to BIL (0.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TPLC dropped -38.02% vs BIL's -0.78%.

On 5-year performance, TPLC leads with 8.34% vs 3.45% for BIL. On fees, BIL is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, BIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, TPLC has performed better with a 8.34% return vs 3.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BIL is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for TPLC.

BIL has the higher dividend yield at 3.85%, compared with 0.85% for TPLC.

TPLC is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while BIL is Government Bonds. TPLC tracks Victory U.S. Large Cap Volatility Weighted BRI Index, while BIL tracks Bloomberg 1-3 Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index. They also come from different issuers: Timothy Plan and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for TPLC and 0.14% for BIL.

BIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (19.32 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TPLC and BIL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer