TPLC vs. BUG
TPLC (Timothy Plan Fund Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core Fund) and BUG (Global X Cybersecurity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TPLC is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Victory U.S. Large Cap Volatility Weighted BRI Index, while BUG is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Indxx Cybersecurity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, TPLC returned 8.22%/yr vs 6.86%/yr for BUG. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TPLC charges 0.52%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for BUG.
Performance
TPLC vs. BUG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TPLC achieves a 8.78% return, which is significantly lower than BUG's 20.72% return.
TPLC
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 1.66%
- YTD
- 8.78%
- 6M
- 7.78%
- 1Y
- 12.59%
- 3Y*
- 13.91%
- 5Y*
- 8.22%
- 10Y*
- —
BUG
- 1D
- -4.04%
- 1M
- 33.08%
- YTD
- 20.72%
- 6M
- 15.17%
- 1Y
- 2.89%
- 3Y*
- 15.82%
- 5Y*
- 6.86%
- 10Y*
- —
TPLC vs. BUG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TPLC Timothy Plan Fund Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core Fund | 8.78% | 7.08% | 13.10% | 15.17% | -12.58% | 26.34% | 14.55% | 5.36% |
BUG Global X Cybersecurity ETF | 20.72% | -5.04% | 9.59% | 41.40% | -33.63% | 13.24% | 70.83% | 6.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between TPLC and BUG is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2019 | 0.58 |
Over the past year, the correlation between TPLC and BUG has dropped to 0.36 - well below their long-term average of 0.58, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
TPLC vs. BUG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TPLC
BUG
Industrials
-
Technology
Financial Services
-
Utilities
-
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
-
Communication Services
Industrials
TPLC
BUG
-
Technology
TPLC
BUG
Financial Services
TPLC
BUG
-
Utilities
TPLC
BUG
-
Healthcare
TPLC
BUG
Consumer Cyclical
TPLC
BUG
Energy
TPLC
BUG
-
Basic Materials
TPLC
BUG
-
Consumer Defensive
TPLC
BUG
Real Estate
TPLC
BUG
-
Communication Services
TPLC
BUG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TPLC vs. BUG — Risk / Return Rank
TPLC
BUG
TPLC vs. BUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Timothy Plan Fund Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core Fund (TPLC) and Global X Cybersecurity ETF (BUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TPLC | BUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.04 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.67 | 0.08 | +1.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.94 | 0.16 | +5.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TPLC | BUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.10 | 0.09 | +1.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | 0.24 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.49 | +0.07 |
Drawdowns
TPLC vs. BUG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TPLC drawdown since its inception was -38.02%, smaller than the maximum BUG drawdown of -41.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPLC and BUG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TPLC | BUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.02% | -41.66% | +3.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.58% | -37.69% | +30.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.18% | -37.69% | +19.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.63% | -41.66% | +20.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.12% | -4.62% | +4.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.29% | -14.42% | +9.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.13% | 18.36% | -16.23% |
Volatility
TPLC vs. BUG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Timothy Plan Fund Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core Fund (TPLC) is 2.70%, while Global X Cybersecurity ETF (BUG) has a volatility of 14.07%. This indicates that TPLC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TPLC | BUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.70% | 14.07% | -11.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.45% | 25.81% | -17.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.50% | 30.78% | -19.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.14% | 28.47% | -12.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.89% | 29.33% | -9.44% |
TPLC vs. BUG - Expense Ratio Comparison
TPLC has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than BUG's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
TPLC vs. BUG - Dividend Comparison
TPLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, more than BUG's 0.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUG Global X Cybersecurity ETF | 0.03% | 0.04% | 0.09% | 0.10% | 1.56% | 0.66% | 0.46% | 0.24% |
TPLC Timothy Plan Fund Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core Fund | 0.84% | 0.89% | 0.88% | 0.89% | 1.06% | 0.61% | 0.81% | 0.67% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TPLC and BUG have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BUG has higher volatility (14.07%) compared to TPLC (2.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TPLC dropped -38.02% vs BUG's -41.66%.
On 5-year performance, TPLC leads with 8.22% vs 6.86% for BUG. On fees, BUG is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, TPLC has been the lower-risk option at 2.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, TPLC has performed better with a 8.22% return vs 6.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BUG is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for TPLC.
TPLC has the higher dividend yield at 0.84%, compared with 0.03% for BUG.
TPLC is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while BUG is Technology Equities. TPLC tracks Victory U.S. Large Cap Volatility Weighted BRI Index, while BUG tracks Indxx Cybersecurity Index. They also come from different issuers: Timothy Plan and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for TPLC and 0.50% for BUG.
TPLC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.10 vs 0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TPLC and BUG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer