PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TPL vs. MU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TPL vs. MU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Texas Pacific Land Corporation (TPL) and Micron Technology, Inc. (MU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TPL achieves a 41.69% return, which is significantly lower than MU's 203.41% return. Over the past 10 years, TPL has underperformed MU with an annualized return of 37.28%, while MU has yielded a comparatively higher 52.40% annualized return.


TPL

1D
-2.36%
1M
14.29%
6M
20.59%
YTD
41.69%
1Y
22.88%
3Y*
36.95%
5Y*
20.54%
10Y*
37.28%
ALL TIME*
20.04%

MU

1D
1.94%
1M
-23.67%
6M
138.72%
YTD
203.41%
1Y
657.80%
3Y*
137.11%
5Y*
62.98%
10Y*
52.40%
ALL TIME*
17.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TPL vs. MU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TPL
Texas Pacific Land Corporation
41.69%-21.61%115.31%-32.40%91.29%73.25%-4.69%44.58%21.96%51.18%
MU
Micron Technology, Inc.
203.41%240.24%-0.96%71.93%-45.93%24.21%39.79%69.49%-22.84%87.59%

Correlation

The correlation between TPL and MU is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 1989

0.13

The correlation between TPL and MU shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (all time) to 0.25 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TPL:

$27.99B

MU:

$977.44B

EPS

TPL:

$7.30

MU:

$44.42

PE Ratio

TPL:

55.63

MU:

19.48

PEG Ratio

TPL:

2.94

MU:

0.07

PS Ratio

TPL:

33.39

MU:

10.89

PB Ratio

TPL:

18.00

MU:

9.81

Total Revenue (TTM)

TPL:

$839.03M

MU:

$90.27B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TPL:

$625.27M

MU:

$65.51B

EBITDA (TTM)

TPL:

$690.06M

MU:

$44.96B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TPL vs. MU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TPL
TPL Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
TPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
TPL Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
TPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
TPL Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

MU
MU Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
MU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
MU Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
MU Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
MU Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TPL vs. MU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Texas Pacific Land Corporation (TPL) and Micron Technology, Inc. (MU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TPLMUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-8.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.66

-0.54

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.67

21.93

-21.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.49

74.09

-72.60

TPL vs. MU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TPL Sharpe Ratio is 0.48, which is lower than the MU Sharpe Ratio of 8.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TPL and MU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TPL vs. MU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TPL drawdown since its inception was -73.05%, smaller than the maximum MU drawdown of -98.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPL and MU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TPLMUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.05%

-98.25%

+25.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.23%

-30.28%

-3.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-52.22%

-57.63%

+5.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.50%

-57.63%

+5.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-65.46%

-57.63%

-7.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-28.92%

-28.67%

-0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.27%

-58.05%

+30.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.40%

8.95%

+6.45%

Volatility

TPL vs. MU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Texas Pacific Land Corporation (TPL) is 11.61%, while Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) has a volatility of 30.97%. This indicates that TPL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TPLMUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.61%

30.97%

-19.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

37.08%

63.14%

-26.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

47.66%

76.55%

-28.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

46.23%

55.01%

-8.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

47.27%

50.78%

-3.51%

Dividends

TPL vs. MU - Dividend Comparison

TPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, more than MU's 0.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MU
Micron Technology, Inc.
0.06%0.16%0.55%0.54%0.89%0.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TPL
Texas Pacific Land Corporation
0.56%0.74%1.37%0.83%1.37%0.88%2.20%0.22%0.55%0.30%0.10%0.22%

Financials

TPL vs. MU - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Texas Pacific Land Corporation and Micron Technology, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026April
236.82M
41.46B
(TPL) Total Revenue
(MU) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

TPL vs. MU - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Texas Pacific Land Corporation and Micron Technology, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-40.0%-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026April0
84.6%
Portfolio components
TPL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Texas Pacific Land Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 236.82M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

MU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported a gross profit of 35.06B and revenue of 41.46B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 84.6%.

TPL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Texas Pacific Land Corporation reported an operating income of 182.33M and revenue of 236.82M, resulting in an operating margin of 77.0%.

MU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported an operating income of 33.31B and revenue of 41.46B, resulting in an operating margin of 80.4%.

TPL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Texas Pacific Land Corporation reported a net income of 142.90M and revenue of 236.82M, resulting in a net margin of 60.3%.

MU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported a net income of 28.24B and revenue of 41.46B, resulting in a net margin of 68.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


TPL and MU have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MU has higher volatility (30.97%) compared to TPL (11.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TPL dropped -73.05% vs MU's -98.25%.

MU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (8.69 vs 0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TPL and MU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer