PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TPL vs. CTAS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TPL vs. CTAS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Texas Pacific Land Corporation (TPL) and Cintas Corporation (CTAS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TPL achieves a 32.28% return, which is significantly higher than CTAS's -5.80% return. Over the past 10 years, TPL has outperformed CTAS with an annualized return of 36.58%, while CTAS has yielded a comparatively lower 23.61% annualized return.


TPL

1D
2.53%
1M
-2.32%
YTD
32.28%
6M
35.91%
1Y
2.17%
3Y*
38.06%
5Y*
18.80%
10Y*
36.58%

CTAS

1D
-3.08%
1M
6.51%
YTD
-5.80%
6M
-5.53%
1Y
-19.83%
3Y*
14.43%
5Y*
15.92%
10Y*
23.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TPL vs. CTAS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TPL
Texas Pacific Land Corporation
32.28%-21.61%115.31%-32.40%91.29%73.25%-4.69%44.58%21.96%51.18%
CTAS
Cintas Corporation
-5.80%3.78%22.24%34.82%2.97%26.51%32.74%61.73%9.04%36.32%

Correlation

The correlation between TPL and CTAS is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 1990

0.14

The correlation between TPL and CTAS shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (1 year) to 0.25 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TPL:

$26.15B

CTAS:

$71.72B

EPS

TPL:

$7.30

CTAS:

$4.75

PE Ratio

TPL:

51.93

CTAS:

37.08

PEG Ratio

TPL:

2.75

CTAS:

2.60

PS Ratio

TPL:

31.17

CTAS:

6.51

PB Ratio

TPL:

16.81

CTAS:

14.98

Total Revenue (TTM)

TPL:

$839.03M

CTAS:

$11.03B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TPL:

$625.27M

CTAS:

$1.33B

EBITDA (TTM)

TPL:

$690.06M

CTAS:

$2.66B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TPL vs. CTAS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TPL
TPL Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
TPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
TPL Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
TPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
TPL Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

CTAS
CTAS Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
CTAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CTAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
CTAS Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
CTAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
CTAS Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TPL vs. CTAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Texas Pacific Land Corporation (TPL) and Cintas Corporation (CTAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TPLCTASDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

0.84

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.13

-0.75

+0.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.25

-1.31

+1.56

TPL vs. CTAS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TPL Sharpe Ratio is 0.09, which is higher than the CTAS Sharpe Ratio of -1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TPL and CTAS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TPL vs. CTAS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TPL drawdown since its inception was -73.05%, which is greater than CTAS's maximum drawdown of -65.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPL and CTAS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TPLCTASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.05%

-65.32%

-7.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.68%

-27.23%

-4.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-52.22%

-27.68%

-24.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.50%

-27.68%

-24.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-65.46%

-48.38%

-17.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-33.65%

-21.83%

-11.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.27%

-15.04%

-12.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.08%

15.61%

+1.47%

Volatility

TPL vs. CTAS - Volatility Comparison

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (TPL) has a higher volatility of 14.23% compared to Cintas Corporation (CTAS) at 8.54%. This indicates that TPL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CTAS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TPLCTASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.23%

8.54%

+5.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.06%

15.74%

+22.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.87%

20.40%

+26.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

46.25%

22.60%

+23.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

47.10%

26.70%

+20.40%

Dividends

TPL vs. CTAS - Dividend Comparison

TPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, less than CTAS's 1.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CTAS
Cintas Corporation
1.02%0.89%0.80%0.83%0.93%0.77%0.99%0.95%1.22%1.04%1.15%1.15%
TPL
Texas Pacific Land Corporation
0.60%0.74%1.37%0.83%1.37%0.88%2.20%0.22%0.55%0.30%0.10%0.22%

Financials

TPL vs. CTAS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Texas Pacific Land Corporation and Cintas Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B20222023202420252026
236.82M
2.84B
(TPL) Total Revenue
(CTAS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

TPL vs. CTAS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Texas Pacific Land Corporation and Cintas Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-100.0%-50.0%0.0%50.0%100.0%202220232024202520260
-97.8%
Portfolio components
TPL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Texas Pacific Land Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 236.82M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

CTAS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cintas Corporation reported a gross profit of -2.78B and revenue of 2.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -97.8%.

TPL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Texas Pacific Land Corporation reported an operating income of 182.33M and revenue of 236.82M, resulting in an operating margin of 77.0%.

CTAS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cintas Corporation reported an operating income of 659.90M and revenue of 2.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.2%.

TPL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Texas Pacific Land Corporation reported a net income of 142.90M and revenue of 236.82M, resulting in a net margin of 60.3%.

CTAS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cintas Corporation reported a net income of 502.50M and revenue of 2.84B, resulting in a net margin of 17.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


TPL and CTAS have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TPL has higher volatility (14.23%) compared to CTAS (8.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TPL dropped -73.05% vs CTAS's -65.32%.

TPL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.09 vs -1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TPL and CTAS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer