PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CTAS vs. ABM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between CTAS and ABM is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.3

Performance

CTAS vs. ABM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cintas Corporation (CTAS) and ABM Industries Incorporated (ABM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
5.95%
-3.52%
CTAS
ABM

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CTAS:

1.58

ABM:

0.51

Sortino Ratio

CTAS:

2.10

ABM:

0.85

Omega Ratio

CTAS:

1.36

ABM:

1.12

Calmar Ratio

CTAS:

1.87

ABM:

0.55

Martin Ratio

CTAS:

12.79

ABM:

2.16

Ulcer Index

CTAS:

2.83%

ABM:

6.01%

Daily Std Dev

CTAS:

22.92%

ABM:

25.43%

Max Drawdown

CTAS:

-65.32%

ABM:

-59.61%

Current Drawdown

CTAS:

-17.45%

ABM:

-14.11%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CTAS:

$84.04B

ABM:

$3.45B

EPS

CTAS:

$3.96

ABM:

$2.42

PE Ratio

CTAS:

52.62

ABM:

22.69

PEG Ratio

CTAS:

4.46

ABM:

4.45

Total Revenue (TTM)

CTAS:

$7.38B

ABM:

$6.18B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CTAS:

$3.57B

ABM:

$733.00M

EBITDA (TTM)

CTAS:

$1.98B

ABM:

$274.00M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CTAS achieves a 25.08% return, which is significantly higher than ABM's 14.44% return. Over the past 10 years, CTAS has outperformed ABM with an annualized return of 26.45%, while ABM has yielded a comparatively lower 7.77% annualized return.


CTAS

YTD

25.08%

1M

-14.54%

6M

5.95%

1Y

27.77%

5Y*

23.63%

10Y*

26.45%

ABM

YTD

14.44%

1M

-9.43%

6M

-3.52%

1Y

13.15%

5Y*

7.49%

10Y*

7.77%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CTAS vs. ABM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cintas Corporation (CTAS) and ABM Industries Incorporated (ABM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CTAS, currently valued at 1.58, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.001.580.51
The chart of Sortino ratio for CTAS, currently valued at 2.10, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.100.85
The chart of Omega ratio for CTAS, currently valued at 1.36, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.361.12
The chart of Calmar ratio for CTAS, currently valued at 1.87, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.870.55
The chart of Martin ratio for CTAS, currently valued at 12.79, compared to the broader market-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.0025.0012.792.16
CTAS
ABM

The current CTAS Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is higher than the ABM Sharpe Ratio of 0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CTAS and ABM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
1.58
0.51
CTAS
ABM

Dividends

CTAS vs. ABM - Dividend Comparison

CTAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, less than ABM's 1.79% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
CTAS
Cintas Corporation
0.78%0.83%0.93%0.77%0.79%0.95%1.22%1.04%1.15%1.15%2.17%1.29%
ABM
ABM Industries Incorporated
1.79%1.96%1.76%1.86%1.47%2.40%2.18%1.80%1.62%1.69%2.18%2.12%

Drawdowns

CTAS vs. ABM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CTAS drawdown since its inception was -65.32%, which is greater than ABM's maximum drawdown of -59.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTAS and ABM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-17.45%
-14.11%
CTAS
ABM

Volatility

CTAS vs. ABM - Volatility Comparison

Cintas Corporation (CTAS) has a higher volatility of 13.91% compared to ABM Industries Incorporated (ABM) at 10.63%. This indicates that CTAS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ABM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
13.91%
10.63%
CTAS
ABM

Financials

CTAS vs. ABM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cintas Corporation and ABM Industries Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab