CTAS vs. ABM

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Cintas Corporation (CTAS) and ABM Industries Incorporated (ABM).

Performance

CTAS vs. ABM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cintas Corporation (CTAS) and ABM Industries Incorporated (ABM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CTAS vs. ABM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CTAS Cintas Corporation	-9.86%	3.78%	22.24%	34.82%	2.97%	26.51%	32.74%	61.73%	9.04%	36.32%
ABM ABM Industries Incorporated	-8.34%	-15.53%	16.35%	3.04%	10.73%	9.81%	2.14%	20.39%	-13.05%	-6.13%

Fundamentals

Market Cap CTAS : $68.81B ABM : $2.34B
EPS CTAS : $4.75 ABM : $2.54
PE Ratio CTAS : 35.63 ABM : 15.18
PEG Ratio CTAS : 2.50 ABM : 0.46
PS Ratio CTAS : 6.26 ABM : 0.27
PB Ratio CTAS : 14.37 ABM : 1.36
Total Revenue (TTM) CTAS : $11.03B ABM : $8.87B
Gross Profit (TTM) CTAS : $1.33B ABM : $776.00M
EBITDA (TTM) CTAS : $2.66B ABM : $392.60M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CTAS achieves a -9.86% return, which is significantly lower than ABM's -8.34% return. Over the past 10 years, CTAS has outperformed ABM with an annualized return of 23.61%, while ABM has yielded a comparatively lower 3.88% annualized return.

CTAS

• 1D: 0.28%
• 1M: -15.91%
• YTD: -9.86%
• 6M: -17.21%
• 1Y: -17.00%
• 3Y*: 14.50%
• 5Y*: 15.26%
• 10Y*: 23.61%

ABM

• 1D: 1.69%
• 1M: -13.44%
• YTD: -8.34%
• 6M: -15.45%
• 1Y: -16.76%
• 3Y*: -2.99%
• 5Y*: -3.60%
• 10Y*: 3.88%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CTAS vs. ABM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CTAS

CTAS Risk / Return Rank: 14
CTAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
CTAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
CTAS Omega Ratio Rank: 12
CTAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
CTAS Martin Ratio Rank: 16

ABM

ABM Risk / Return Rank: 19
ABM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
ABM Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
ABM Omega Ratio Rank: 18
ABM Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
ABM Martin Ratio Rank: 18

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CTAS vs. ABM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cintas Corporation (CTAS) and ABM Industries Incorporated (ABM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CTAS	ABM	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.80	-0.55	-0.25
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-1.02	-0.57	-0.44
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.87	0.92	-0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.60	-0.60	0.00
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.31	-1.24	-0.07
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CTAS vs. ABM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CTAS Sharpe Ratio is -0.80, which is lower than the ABM Sharpe Ratio of -0.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CTAS and ABM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CTAS	ABM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.80	-0.55	-0.25
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.68	-0.12	+0.80
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.89	0.12	+0.78
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.52	0.29	+0.23

Correlation

The correlation between CTAS and ABM is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CTAS vs. ABM - Dividend Comparison

CTAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than ABM's 2.82% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CTAS Cintas Corporation	1.03%	0.89%	0.80%	0.83%	0.93%	0.77%	0.99%	0.95%	1.22%	1.04%	1.15%	1.15%
ABM ABM Industries Incorporated	2.82%	2.51%	1.76%	1.96%	1.76%	1.86%	1.47%	2.40%	2.18%	1.80%	1.62%	1.69%

Drawdowns

CTAS vs. ABM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CTAS drawdown since its inception was -65.32%, which is greater than ABM's maximum drawdown of -59.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTAS and ABM.

Drawdown Indicators

	CTAS	ABM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-65.32%	-59.64%	-5.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-26.72%	-27.81%	+1.09%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.72%	-34.37%	+7.65%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-48.38%	-52.00%	+3.62%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-25.20%	-32.39%	+7.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.99%	-14.75%	-0.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.22%	13.43%	-1.21%

Volatility

CTAS vs. ABM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cintas Corporation (CTAS) is 7.96%, while ABM Industries Incorporated (ABM) has a volatility of 8.45%. This indicates that CTAS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ABM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CTAS	ABM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.96%	8.45%	-0.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.35%	22.06%	-7.71%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.38%	30.53%	-9.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.49%	30.99%	-8.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.52%	33.75%	-7.23%

Financials

CTAS vs. ABM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Cintas Corporation and ABM Industries Incorporated over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

CTAS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cintas Corporation reported a gross profit of -2.78B and revenue of 2.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -97.8%.

ABM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, ABM Industries Incorporated reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 2.24B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

CTAS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cintas Corporation reported an operating income of 659.90M and revenue of 2.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.2%.

ABM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, ABM Industries Incorporated reported an operating income of 74.70M and revenue of 2.24B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.3%.

CTAS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cintas Corporation reported a net income of 502.50M and revenue of 2.84B, resulting in a net margin of 17.7%.

ABM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, ABM Industries Incorporated reported a net income of 38.80M and revenue of 2.24B, resulting in a net margin of 1.7%.