PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TPIF vs. PRAY
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

TPIF vs. PRAY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Timothy Plan International ETF (TPIF) and FIS Biblically Responsible Risk Managed ETF (PRAY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

TPIF vs. PRAY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
TPIF
Timothy Plan International ETF
4.04%34.34%3.49%16.64%-14.52%
PRAY
FIS Biblically Responsible Risk Managed ETF
2.94%9.08%13.02%20.02%-13.49%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TPIF achieves a 4.04% return, which is significantly higher than PRAY's 2.94% return.


TPIF

1D
3.18%
1M
-6.72%
YTD
4.04%
6M
9.03%
1Y
28.71%
3Y*
16.12%
5Y*
7.78%
10Y*

PRAY

1D
3.11%
1M
-5.13%
YTD
2.94%
6M
3.31%
1Y
14.05%
3Y*
13.44%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TPIF vs. PRAY - Expense Ratio Comparison

TPIF has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is lower than PRAY's 0.69% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

TPIF vs. PRAY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TPIF
TPIF Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
TPIF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TPIF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
TPIF Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
TPIF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
TPIF Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

PRAY
PRAY Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
PRAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRAY Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
PRAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRAY Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TPIF vs. PRAY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Timothy Plan International ETF (TPIF) and FIS Biblically Responsible Risk Managed ETF (PRAY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TPIFPRAYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.77

0.84

+0.93

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.44

1.34

+1.10

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.18

+0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.76

1.17

+1.58

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.98

5.43

+5.56

TPIF vs. PRAY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TPIF Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is higher than the PRAY Sharpe Ratio of 0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TPIF and PRAY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TPIFPRAYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.77

0.84

+0.93

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.43

+0.04

Correlation

The correlation between TPIF and PRAY is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

TPIF vs. PRAY - Dividend Comparison

TPIF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.35%, more than PRAY's 0.67% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
TPIF
Timothy Plan International ETF
2.35%2.65%2.98%2.40%2.58%2.38%1.72%0.13%
PRAY
FIS Biblically Responsible Risk Managed ETF
0.67%0.69%0.76%0.83%1.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

TPIF vs. PRAY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TPIF drawdown since its inception was -34.02%, which is greater than PRAY's maximum drawdown of -21.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPIF and PRAY.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


TPIFPRAYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.02%

-21.40%

-12.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.19%

-11.45%

+1.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.83%

-5.97%

-0.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.11%

-5.61%

-2.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.56%

2.47%

+0.09%

Volatility

TPIF vs. PRAY - Volatility Comparison

Timothy Plan International ETF (TPIF) has a higher volatility of 7.58% compared to FIS Biblically Responsible Risk Managed ETF (PRAY) at 6.29%. This indicates that TPIF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRAY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


TPIFPRAYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.58%

6.29%

+1.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.38%

9.78%

+0.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.34%

16.78%

-0.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.54%

16.03%

-0.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.34%

16.03%

+2.31%