TPIF vs. PRAY

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TPIF (Timothy Plan International ETF) and PRAY (FIS Biblically Responsible Risk Managed ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TPIF is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Victory International Volatility Weighted BRI Index, while PRAY is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the NONE. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, TPIF returned 17.61%/yr vs 16.61%/yr for PRAY. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TPIF charges 0.62%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for PRAY.

Performance

TPIF vs. PRAY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Timothy Plan International ETF (TPIF) and FIS Biblically Responsible Risk Managed ETF (PRAY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TPIF achieves a 9.41% return, which is significantly lower than PRAY's 14.78% return.

TPIF

• 1D: -0.56%
• 1M: 1.55%
• YTD: 9.41%
• 6M: 11.47%
• 1Y: 22.50%
• 3Y*: 17.61%
• 5Y*: 7.66%
• 10Y*: —

PRAY

• 1D: -0.81%
• 1M: 3.83%
• YTD: 14.78%
• 6M: 14.02%
• 1Y: 21.06%
• 3Y*: 16.61%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TPIF vs. PRAY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
TPIF Timothy Plan International ETF	9.41%	34.34%	3.49%	16.64%	-14.52%
PRAY FIS Biblically Responsible Risk Managed ETF	14.78%	9.08%	13.02%	20.02%	-13.49%

Correlation

The correlation between TPIF and PRAY is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2022	0.80

The correlation between TPIF and PRAY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

TPIF vs. PRAY - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TPIF	PRAY
Financial Services	24.5%	12.5%
Industrials	23.6%	15.3%
Basic Materials	9.2%	3.0%
Utilities	8.5%	4.2%
Technology	7.1%	25.2%
Consumer Cyclical	6.1%	14.3%
Energy	6.0%	3.8%
Healthcare	5.8%	7.7%
Consumer Defensive	3.7%	4.0%
Communication Services	2.5%	8.6%
Real Estate	2.3%	1.6%

Return for Risk

TPIF vs. PRAY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TPIF

TPIF Risk / Return Rank: 48
TPIF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
TPIF Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
TPIF Omega Ratio Rank: 48
TPIF Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
TPIF Martin Ratio Rank: 52

PRAY

PRAY Risk / Return Rank: 51
PRAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
PRAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
PRAY Omega Ratio Rank: 47
PRAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
PRAY Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TPIF vs. PRAY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Timothy Plan International ETF (TPIF) and FIS Biblically Responsible Risk Managed ETF (PRAY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TPIF	PRAY	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.65	1.67	-0.02
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.30	2.47	-0.17
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.29	+0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.22	2.40	-0.19
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.72	10.57	-1.85
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TPIF vs. PRAY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TPIF Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is comparable to the PRAY Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TPIF and PRAY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TPIF	PRAY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.65	1.67	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.49	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.51	0.59	-0.07

Drawdowns

TPIF vs. PRAY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TPIF drawdown since its inception was -34.02%, which is greater than PRAY's maximum drawdown of -21.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPIF and PRAY.

Drawdown Indicators

	TPIF	PRAY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.02%	-21.40%	-12.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.19%	-8.80%	-1.39%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.64%	-17.13%	+4.49%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.11%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.01%	-0.81%	-1.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.96%	-5.43%	-2.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.59%	2.00%	+0.59%

Volatility

TPIF vs. PRAY - Volatility Comparison

Timothy Plan International ETF (TPIF) has a higher volatility of 4.76% compared to FIS Biblically Responsible Risk Managed ETF (PRAY) at 4.21%. This indicates that TPIF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRAY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TPIF	PRAY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.76%	4.21%	+0.55%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.53%	10.58%	+0.95%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.71%	12.70%	+1.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.66%	16.00%	-0.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.29%	16.00%	+2.29%

TPIF vs. PRAY - Expense Ratio Comparison

TPIF has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is lower than PRAY's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

TPIF vs. PRAY - Dividend Comparison

TPIF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.62%, more than PRAY's 0.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
PRAY FIS Biblically Responsible Risk Managed ETF	0.60%	0.69%	0.76%	0.83%	1.20%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TPIF Timothy Plan International ETF	2.62%	2.65%	2.98%	2.40%	2.58%	2.38%	1.72%	0.13%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TPIF and PRAY in my portfolio?

TPIF and PRAY have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TPIF or PRAY?

TPIF has higher volatility (4.76%) compared to PRAY (4.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TPIF dropped -34.02% vs PRAY's -21.40%.

Which ETF is better, TPIF or PRAY?

On 3-year performance, TPIF leads with 17.61% vs 16.61% for PRAY. On fees, TPIF is cheaper at 0.62% per year. On volatility, PRAY has been the lower-risk option at 4.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TPIF or PRAY?

Over the 3-year period, TPIF has performed better with a 17.61% return vs 16.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TPIF or PRAY?

TPIF is cheaper with a 0.62% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for PRAY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TPIF or PRAY?

TPIF has the higher dividend yield at 2.62%, compared with 0.60% for PRAY.

What is the main difference between TPIF and PRAY?

TPIF is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while PRAY is Large Cap Blend Equities. TPIF tracks Victory International Volatility Weighted BRI Index, while PRAY tracks NONE. They also come from different issuers: Timothy Plan and Faith Investor Services. Their fees differ too: 0.62% for TPIF and 0.69% for PRAY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PRAY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.