PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TPIF vs. FDT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TPIF vs. FDT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Timothy Plan International ETF (TPIF) and First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund (FDT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TPIF achieves a 9.41% return, which is significantly lower than FDT's 25.50% return.


TPIF

1D
-0.56%
1M
1.55%
YTD
9.41%
6M
11.47%
1Y
22.50%
3Y*
17.61%
5Y*
7.66%
10Y*

FDT

1D
-0.64%
1M
5.22%
YTD
25.50%
6M
28.63%
1Y
55.05%
3Y*
30.08%
5Y*
12.55%
10Y*
10.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TPIF vs. FDT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
TPIF
Timothy Plan International ETF
9.41%34.34%3.49%16.64%-18.07%10.42%7.21%3.65%
FDT
First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund
25.50%52.21%6.97%15.03%-19.51%11.43%4.29%4.14%

Correlation

The correlation between TPIF and FDT is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2019

0.90

The correlation between TPIF and FDT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

TPIF vs. FDT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TPIF
FDT

Financial Services

24.5%
10.2%

Industrials

23.6%
34.0%

Basic Materials

9.2%
9.6%

Utilities

8.5%
5.2%

Technology

7.1%
8.1%

Consumer Cyclical

6.1%
11.5%

Energy

6.0%
9.2%

Healthcare

5.8%
1.4%

Consumer Defensive

3.7%
2.8%

Communication Services

2.5%
2.7%

Real Estate

2.3%
5.3%

Financial Services

TPIF
24.5%
FDT
10.2%

Industrials

TPIF
23.6%
FDT
34.0%

Basic Materials

TPIF
9.2%
FDT
9.6%

Utilities

TPIF
8.5%
FDT
5.2%

Technology

TPIF
7.1%
FDT
8.1%

Consumer Cyclical

TPIF
6.1%
FDT
11.5%

Energy

TPIF
6.0%
FDT
9.2%

Healthcare

TPIF
5.8%
FDT
1.4%

Consumer Defensive

TPIF
3.7%
FDT
2.8%

Communication Services

TPIF
2.5%
FDT
2.7%

Real Estate

TPIF
2.3%
FDT
5.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TPIF vs. FDT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TPIF
TPIF Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
TPIF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TPIF Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
TPIF Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
TPIF Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
TPIF Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

FDT
FDT Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
FDT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDT Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
FDT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDT Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TPIF vs. FDT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Timothy Plan International ETF (TPIF) and First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund (FDT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TPIFFDTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.65

3.00

-1.35

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.30

3.85

-1.55

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.54

-0.24

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.22

4.13

-1.91

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.72

16.12

-7.40

TPIF vs. FDT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TPIF Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is lower than the FDT Sharpe Ratio of 3.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TPIF and FDT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TPIFFDTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.65

3.00

-1.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

0.69

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.40

+0.11

Drawdowns

TPIF vs. FDT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TPIF drawdown since its inception was -34.02%, smaller than the maximum FDT drawdown of -46.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPIF and FDT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TPIFFDTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.02%

-46.10%

+12.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.19%

-13.41%

+3.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.64%

-14.29%

+1.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.11%

-33.18%

+1.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.01%

-1.59%

-0.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.96%

-10.78%

+2.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.59%

3.43%

-0.84%

Volatility

TPIF vs. FDT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Timothy Plan International ETF (TPIF) is 4.76%, while First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund (FDT) has a volatility of 7.23%. This indicates that TPIF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TPIFFDTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.76%

7.23%

-2.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.53%

15.91%

-4.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.71%

18.42%

-4.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.66%

18.23%

-2.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.29%

18.52%

-0.23%

TPIF vs. FDT - Expense Ratio Comparison

TPIF has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is lower than FDT's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

TPIF vs. FDT - Dividend Comparison

TPIF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.62%, less than FDT's 2.84% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDT
First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund
2.84%3.27%3.89%4.36%2.29%3.80%2.42%2.78%2.13%1.57%1.76%1.83%
TPIF
Timothy Plan International ETF
2.62%2.65%2.98%2.40%2.58%2.38%1.72%0.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TPIF and FDT have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDT has higher volatility (7.23%) compared to TPIF (4.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TPIF dropped -34.02% vs FDT's -46.10%.

On 5-year performance, FDT leads with 12.55% vs 7.66% for TPIF. On fees, TPIF is cheaper at 0.62% per year. On volatility, TPIF has been the lower-risk option at 4.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FDT has performed better with a 12.55% return vs 7.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TPIF is cheaper with a 0.62% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FDT.

FDT has the higher dividend yield at 2.84%, compared with 2.62% for TPIF.

TPIF tracks Victory International Volatility Weighted BRI Index, while FDT tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX DM Ex-US Index. They also come from different issuers: Timothy Plan and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.62% for TPIF and 0.80% for FDT.

FDT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.00 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TPIF and FDT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer