PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TPIF vs. FDT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TPIF vs. FDT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Timothy Plan International ETF (TPIF) and First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund (FDT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TPIF achieves a 11.59% return, which is significantly lower than FDT's 15.42% return.


TPIF

1D
0.42%
1M
1.47%
6M
5.91%
YTD
11.59%
1Y
23.04%
3Y*
17.90%
5Y*
7.87%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.47%

FDT

1D
1.04%
1M
-3.04%
6M
5.14%
YTD
15.42%
1Y
34.58%
3Y*
23.94%
5Y*
11.15%
10Y*
9.72%
ALL TIME*
6.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$17.33M$12.78M$12.06M
$1.01M$1.05M$1.25M

TPIF vs. FDT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
TPIF
Timothy Plan International ETF
11.59%34.34%3.49%16.64%-18.07%10.42%7.21%4.13%
FDT
First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund
15.42%52.21%6.97%15.03%-19.51%11.43%4.29%3.96%

Correlation

The correlation between TPIF and FDT is 0.87, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2019

0.90

The correlation between TPIF and FDT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

TPIF vs. FDT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TPIF
FDT

Industrials

25.2%
33.3%

Financial Services

24.8%
10.0%

Utilities

8.6%
4.7%

Basic Materials

8.4%
8.6%

Technology

7.6%
13.1%

Healthcare

5.9%
1.3%

Consumer Cyclical

5.7%
11.1%

Energy

5.6%
7.6%

Consumer Defensive

3.6%
2.7%

Communication Services

2.4%
2.5%

Real Estate

2.2%
5.1%

Industrials

TPIF
25.2%
FDT
33.3%

Financial Services

TPIF
24.8%
FDT
10.0%

Utilities

TPIF
8.6%
FDT
4.7%

Basic Materials

TPIF
8.4%
FDT
8.6%

Technology

TPIF
7.6%
FDT
13.1%

Healthcare

TPIF
5.9%
FDT
1.3%

Consumer Cyclical

TPIF
5.7%
FDT
11.1%

Energy

TPIF
5.6%
FDT
7.6%

Consumer Defensive

TPIF
3.6%
FDT
2.7%

Communication Services

TPIF
2.4%
FDT
2.5%

Real Estate

TPIF
2.2%
FDT
5.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TPIF vs. FDT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TPIF
TPIF Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
TPIF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TPIF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
TPIF Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
TPIF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
TPIF Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

FDT
FDT Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
FDT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDT Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
FDT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDT Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TPIF vs. FDT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Timothy Plan International ETF (TPIF) and First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund (FDT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TPIFFDTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.31

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.27

2.59

-0.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.65

7.60

+1.06

TPIF vs. FDT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TPIF Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is comparable to the FDT Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TPIF and FDT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TPIF vs. FDT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TPIF drawdown since its inception was -34.02%, smaller than the maximum FDT drawdown of -46.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPIF and FDT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TPIFFDTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.02%

-46.10%

+12.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.19%

-13.41%

+3.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.68%

-14.29%

+2.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.11%

-32.80%

+0.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.47%

-9.49%

+9.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.81%

-10.73%

+2.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.67%

4.56%

-1.89%

Volatility

TPIF vs. FDT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Timothy Plan International ETF (TPIF) is 4.06%, while First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund (FDT) has a volatility of 6.45%. This indicates that TPIF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TPIFFDTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.06%

6.45%

-2.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.59%

18.62%

-6.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.44%

20.83%

-6.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.78%

18.68%

-2.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.23%

18.58%

-0.35%

TPIF vs. FDT - Expense Ratio Comparison

TPIF has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is lower than FDT's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

TPIF vs. FDT - Dividend Comparison

TPIF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.68%, less than FDT's 2.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDT
First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund
2.90%3.27%3.89%4.36%2.29%3.80%2.42%2.78%2.13%1.57%1.76%1.83%
TPIF
Timothy Plan International ETF
2.68%2.65%2.98%2.40%2.58%2.38%1.72%0.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TPIF and FDT have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDT has higher volatility (6.45%) compared to TPIF (4.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TPIF dropped -34.02% vs FDT's -46.10%.

On 5-year performance, FDT leads with 11.15% vs 7.87% for TPIF. On fees, TPIF is cheaper at 0.62% per year. On volatility, TPIF has been the lower-risk option at 4.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FDT has performed better with a 11.15% return vs 7.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TPIF is cheaper with a 0.62% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FDT.

FDT has the higher dividend yield at 2.90%, compared with 2.68% for TPIF.

TPIF tracks Victory International Volatility Weighted BRI Index, while FDT tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX DM Ex-US Index. They also come from different issuers: Timothy Plan and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.62% for TPIF and 0.80% for FDT.

FDT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TPIF and FDT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer