PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TPIF vs. BIBL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TPIF vs. BIBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Timothy Plan International ETF (TPIF) and Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TPIF achieves a 11.59% return, which is significantly lower than BIBL's 22.46% return.


TPIF

1D
0.42%
1M
1.47%
6M
5.91%
YTD
11.59%
1Y
23.04%
3Y*
17.90%
5Y*
7.87%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.47%

BIBL

1D
0.84%
1M
-1.49%
6M
14.85%
YTD
22.46%
1Y
32.81%
3Y*
19.64%
5Y*
9.17%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.68M$2.89M$2.95M
$1.01M$1.05M$1.25M

TPIF vs. BIBL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
TPIF
Timothy Plan International ETF
11.59%34.34%3.49%16.64%-18.07%10.42%7.21%4.13%
BIBL
Inspire 100 ETF
22.46%17.27%12.49%17.87%-23.26%27.44%22.62%4.61%

Correlation

The correlation between TPIF and BIBL is 0.69, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2019

0.76

The correlation between TPIF and BIBL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

TPIF vs. BIBL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TPIF
BIBL

Industrials

25.2%
26.8%

Financial Services

24.8%
8.3%

Utilities

8.6%
3.4%

Basic Materials

8.4%
3.8%

Technology

7.6%
33.0%

Healthcare

5.9%
4.4%

Consumer Cyclical

5.7%
0.3%

Energy

5.6%
5.4%

Consumer Defensive

3.6%
0.4%

Communication Services

2.4%

-

Real Estate

2.2%
14.2%

Industrials

TPIF
25.2%
BIBL
26.8%

Financial Services

TPIF
24.8%
BIBL
8.3%

Utilities

TPIF
8.6%
BIBL
3.4%

Basic Materials

TPIF
8.4%
BIBL
3.8%

Technology

TPIF
7.6%
BIBL
33.0%

Healthcare

TPIF
5.9%
BIBL
4.4%

Consumer Cyclical

TPIF
5.7%
BIBL
0.3%

Energy

TPIF
5.6%
BIBL
5.4%

Consumer Defensive

TPIF
3.6%
BIBL
0.4%

Communication Services

TPIF
2.4%
BIBL

-

Real Estate

TPIF
2.2%
BIBL
14.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TPIF vs. BIBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TPIF
TPIF Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
TPIF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TPIF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
TPIF Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
TPIF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
TPIF Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

BIBL
BIBL Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
BIBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIBL Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
BIBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIBL Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TPIF vs. BIBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Timothy Plan International ETF (TPIF) and Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TPIFBIBLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.33

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.27

3.69

-1.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.65

13.27

-4.62

TPIF vs. BIBL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TPIF Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is comparable to the BIBL Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TPIF and BIBL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TPIF vs. BIBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TPIF drawdown since its inception was -34.02%, smaller than the maximum BIBL drawdown of -36.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPIF and BIBL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TPIFBIBLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.02%

-36.12%

+2.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.19%

-8.94%

-1.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.68%

-20.60%

+8.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.11%

-30.85%

-1.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.47%

-5.10%

+4.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.81%

-6.96%

-0.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.67%

2.48%

+0.19%

Volatility

TPIF vs. BIBL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Timothy Plan International ETF (TPIF) is 4.06%, while Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL) has a volatility of 4.89%. This indicates that TPIF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BIBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TPIFBIBLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.06%

4.89%

-0.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.59%

14.36%

-1.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.44%

17.42%

-2.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.78%

19.92%

-4.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.23%

21.10%

-2.87%

TPIF vs. BIBL - Expense Ratio Comparison

TPIF has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than BIBL's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

TPIF vs. BIBL - Dividend Comparison

TPIF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.68%, more than BIBL's 0.94% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
BIBL
Inspire 100 ETF
0.94%1.01%0.92%1.02%0.98%17.87%1.67%1.30%1.49%0.31%
TPIF
Timothy Plan International ETF
2.68%2.65%2.98%2.40%2.58%2.38%1.72%0.13%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TPIF and BIBL have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BIBL has higher volatility (4.89%) compared to TPIF (4.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TPIF dropped -34.02% vs BIBL's -36.12%.

On 5-year performance, BIBL leads with 9.17% vs 7.87% for TPIF. On fees, BIBL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, TPIF has been the lower-risk option at 4.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BIBL has performed better with a 9.17% return vs 7.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BIBL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for TPIF.

TPIF has the higher dividend yield at 2.68%, compared with 0.94% for BIBL.

TPIF is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while BIBL is Large Cap Growth Equities. TPIF tracks Victory International Volatility Weighted BRI Index, while BIBL tracks Inspire 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Timothy Plan and Inspire. Their fees differ too: 0.62% for TPIF and 0.35% for BIBL.

BIBL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TPIF and BIBL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer