TPHD vs. ABLD

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TPHD (Timothy Plan High Dividend Stock ETF) and ABLD (Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds - TPHD tracks the Victory US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Weighted BRI Index while ABLD tracks the FCF Yield Enhanced Real Asset Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, TPHD returned 13.21%/yr vs 12.75%/yr for ABLD. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TPHD charges 0.52%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for ABLD.

Performance

TPHD vs. ABLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Timothy Plan High Dividend Stock ETF (TPHD) and Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF (ABLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with TPHD having a 8.56% return and ABLD slightly higher at 8.60%.

TPHD

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: -1.27%
• YTD: 8.56%
• 6M: 7.69%
• 1Y: 13.23%
• 3Y*: 13.21%
• 5Y*: 8.52%
• 10Y*: —

ABLD

• 1D: -0.14%
• 1M: -2.02%
• YTD: 8.60%
• 6M: 8.04%
• 1Y: 15.09%
• 3Y*: 12.75%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TPHD vs. ABLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
TPHD Timothy Plan High Dividend Stock ETF	8.56%	8.28%	12.14%	8.86%	-1.91%	3.00%
ABLD Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF	8.60%	6.64%	7.05%	18.89%	7.42%	3.86%

Correlation

The correlation between TPHD and ABLD is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.74
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2021	0.83

The correlation between TPHD and ABLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

TPHD vs. ABLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TPHD

TPHD Risk / Return Rank: 38
TPHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
TPHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
TPHD Omega Ratio Rank: 33
TPHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
TPHD Martin Ratio Rank: 39

ABLD

ABLD Risk / Return Rank: 29
ABLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
ABLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
ABLD Omega Ratio Rank: 29
ABLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
ABLD Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TPHD vs. ABLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Timothy Plan High Dividend Stock ETF (TPHD) and Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF (ABLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TPHD	ABLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.27	1.03	+0.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.92	1.47	+0.45
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.19	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.19	1.30	+0.88
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.20	4.50	+1.70
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TPHD vs. ABLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TPHD Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is comparable to the ABLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TPHD and ABLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TPHD	ABLD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.27	1.03	+0.24
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.59	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.51	0.68	-0.17

Drawdowns

TPHD vs. ABLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TPHD drawdown since its inception was -41.71%, which is greater than ABLD's maximum drawdown of -19.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPHD and ABLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	TPHD	ABLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.71%	-19.35%	-22.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.08%	-11.64%	+5.56%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.89%	-19.35%	+3.46%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.54%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.25%	-7.31%	+4.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.73%	-3.96%	-0.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.14%	3.36%	-1.22%

Volatility

TPHD vs. ABLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Timothy Plan High Dividend Stock ETF (TPHD) is 2.60%, while Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF (ABLD) has a volatility of 4.52%. This indicates that TPHD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ABLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TPHD	ABLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.60%	4.52%	-1.92%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.35%	12.85%	-5.50%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.48%	14.70%	-4.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.60%	17.52%	-2.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.63%	17.52%	+2.11%

TPHD vs. ABLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

TPHD has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than ABLD's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

TPHD vs. ABLD - Dividend Comparison

TPHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%, less than ABLD's 4.20% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
ABLD Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF	4.20%	2.86%	10.13%	4.70%	8.40%	0.08%	0.00%	0.00%
TPHD Timothy Plan High Dividend Stock ETF	2.00%	2.10%	2.09%	2.19%	2.38%	1.86%	2.38%	1.61%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TPHD and ABLD in my portfolio?

TPHD and ABLD have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TPHD or ABLD?

ABLD has higher volatility (4.52%) compared to TPHD (2.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TPHD dropped -41.71% vs ABLD's -19.35%.

Which ETF is better, TPHD or ABLD?

On 3-year performance, TPHD leads with 13.21% vs 12.75% for ABLD. On fees, ABLD is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, TPHD has been the lower-risk option at 2.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TPHD or ABLD?

Over the 3-year period, TPHD has performed better with a 13.21% return vs 12.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TPHD or ABLD?

ABLD is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for TPHD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TPHD or ABLD?

ABLD has the higher dividend yield at 4.20%, compared with 2.00% for TPHD.

What is the main difference between TPHD and ABLD?

TPHD tracks Victory US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Weighted BRI Index, while ABLD tracks FCF Yield Enhanced Real Asset Index. They also come from different issuers: Timothy Plan and Abacus. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for TPHD and 0.39% for ABLD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TPHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.27 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.