TPFG vs. ITOT
TPFG (Timothy Plan Free Cash Flow Growth ETF) and ITOT (iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - TPFG tracks the Victory Free Cash Flow Growth BRI Index while ITOT tracks the S&P Total Market Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TPFG charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for ITOT.
Performance
TPFG vs. ITOT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TPFG
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- -7.12%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ITOT
- 1D
- -0.97%
- 1M
- 0.57%
- 6M
- 8.09%
- YTD
- 10.17%
- 1Y
- 19.94%
- 3Y*
- 19.00%
- 5Y*
- 12.10%
- 10Y*
- 14.54%
TPFG vs. ITOT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TPFG Timothy Plan Free Cash Flow Growth ETF | -1.22% |
ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | 4.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between TPFG and ITOT is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2026 | 0.77 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TPFG vs. ITOT — Risk / Return Rank
TPFG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ITOT
TPFG vs. ITOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Timothy Plan Free Cash Flow Growth ETF (TPFG) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TPFG | ITOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.28 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.25 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 9.79 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TPFG vs. ITOT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TPFG drawdown since its inception was -10.01%, smaller than the maximum ITOT drawdown of -55.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPFG and ITOT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TPFG | ITOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.01% | -55.20% | +45.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.90% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.44% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.01% | -1.69% | -8.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.00% | -6.94% | +3.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.04% | — |
Volatility
TPFG vs. ITOT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TPFG | ITOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.39% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.19% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.66% | 12.89% | +19.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.66% | 17.46% | +15.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.66% | 18.25% | +14.41% |
TPFG vs. ITOT - Expense Ratio Comparison
TPFG has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than ITOT's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
TPFG vs. ITOT - Dividend Comparison
TPFG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ITOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | 1.01% | 1.11% | 1.23% | 1.47% | 1.66% | 1.18% | 1.41% | 1.88% | 2.14% | 1.69% | 1.83% | 2.01% |
TPFG Timothy Plan Free Cash Flow Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TPFG and ITOT have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ITOT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ITOT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for TPFG.
ITOT has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.00% for TPFG.
TPFG tracks Victory Free Cash Flow Growth BRI Index, while ITOT tracks S&P Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Timothy Plan and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for TPFG and 0.03% for ITOT.
Find the right allocation for TPFG and ITOT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer