TPFC vs. SEIV

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

TPFC (Timothy Plan Free Cash Flow ETF) and SEIV (SEI QiM U.S. Large Cap Value Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TPFC is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Victory Free Cash Flow BRI Index, while SEIV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by SEI. TPFC is passively managed, while SEIV is actively managed. Their 0.56 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. TPFC charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for SEIV.

Performance

TPFC vs. SEIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Timothy Plan Free Cash Flow ETF (TPFC) and SEI QiM U.S. Large Cap Value Active ETF (SEIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

TPFC

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: 6.32%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

SEIV

• 1D: 1.87%
• 1M: 6.10%
• 6M: 20.23%
• YTD: 23.16%
• 1Y: 43.07%
• 3Y*: 26.48%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 20.26%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
SEIV SEI QiM U.S. Large Cap Value Active ETF	$9.33M	$9.02M	$6.23M
TPFC Timothy Plan Free Cash Flow ETF	$235.50K	$114.99K	$613.33K

TPFC vs. SEIV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
TPFC Timothy Plan Free Cash Flow ETF	6.86%
SEIV SEI QiM U.S. Large Cap Value Active ETF	15.26%

Correlation

The correlation between TPFC and SEIV is 0.56, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2026	0.56

Return for Risk

TPFC vs. SEIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TPFC

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SEIV

SEIV Risk / Return Rank: 96
SEIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
SEIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
SEIV Omega Ratio Rank: 95
SEIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
SEIV Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TPFC vs. SEIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Timothy Plan Free Cash Flow ETF (TPFC) and SEI QiM U.S. Large Cap Value Active ETF (SEIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TPFC	SEIV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	3.39	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	4.59	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.61	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	6.23	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	23.10	—

Drawdowns

TPFC vs. SEIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TPFC drawdown since its inception was -5.82%, smaller than the maximum SEIV drawdown of -18.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPFC and SEIV.

Drawdown Indicators

	TPFC	SEIV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.82%	-18.18%	+12.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-6.95%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-17.71%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.23%	-3.42%	+1.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.87%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TPFC	SEIV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.80%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	9.64%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.69%	12.85%	+0.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.69%	16.56%	-2.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.69%	16.56%	-2.87%

TPFC vs. SEIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

TPFC has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than SEIV's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

TPFC vs. SEIV - Dividend Comparison

TPFC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, less than SEIV's 1.40% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
SEIV SEI QiM U.S. Large Cap Value Active ETF	1.40%	1.51%	1.66%	2.08%	1.63%
TPFC Timothy Plan Free Cash Flow ETF	0.13%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TPFC and SEIV in my portfolio?

TPFC and SEIV have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TPFC or SEIV?

On fees, SEIV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TPFC or SEIV?

SEIV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for TPFC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TPFC or SEIV?

SEIV has the higher dividend yield at 1.40%, compared with 0.13% for TPFC.

What is the main difference between TPFC and SEIV?

TPFC is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while SEIV is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Timothy Plan and SEI. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for TPFC and 0.15% for SEIV.