PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TPAY vs. AMDW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TPAY vs. AMDW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill S&P 500 Target 10 Managed Distribution ETF (TPAY) and Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


TPAY

1D
0.86%
1M
0.34%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

AMDW

1D
-2.02%
1M
-10.13%
6M
119.90%
YTD
146.74%
1Y
209.29%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
229.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$10.26M$9.58M$8.51M
$8.91K$63.35K$52.42K

TPAY vs. AMDW - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TPAY and AMDW is 0.65, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2026

0.65

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TPAY vs. AMDW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TPAY

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


AMDW
AMDW Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
AMDW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMDW Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMDW Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
AMDW Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMDW Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TPAY vs. AMDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill S&P 500 Target 10 Managed Distribution ETF (TPAY) and Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TPAYAMDWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.47

TPAY vs. AMDW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TPAY vs. AMDW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TPAY drawdown since its inception was -8.62%, smaller than the maximum AMDW drawdown of -34.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPAY and AMDW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TPAYAMDWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.62%

-34.64%

+26.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.44%

-21.39%

+19.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.86%

-13.97%

+12.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.59%

Volatility

TPAY vs. AMDW - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TPAYAMDWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

28.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

67.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.25%

85.70%

-71.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.25%

85.05%

-70.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.25%

85.05%

-70.80%

TPAY vs. AMDW - Expense Ratio Comparison

TPAY has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than AMDW's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

TPAY vs. AMDW - Dividend Comparison

TPAY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.96%, less than AMDW's 53.42% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


TPAY and AMDW have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TPAY is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TPAY is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for AMDW.

AMDW has the higher dividend yield at 53.42%, compared with 3.96% for TPAY.

Their fees differ too: 0.49% for TPAY and 0.99% for AMDW.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TPAY and AMDW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer