TOV vs. FMAY

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

TOV (JLens 500 Jewish Advocacy U.S. ETF) and FMAY (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - TOV tracks the JLens 500 Jewish Advocacy U.S. Index while FMAY tracks the Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index May Series. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, TOV returned 21.97% vs 12.21% for FMAY. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TOV charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for FMAY.

Performance

TOV vs. FMAY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JLens 500 Jewish Advocacy U.S. ETF (TOV) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May (FMAY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TOV achieves a 8.19% return, which is significantly higher than FMAY's 4.02% return.

TOV

• 1D: -0.32%
• 1M: -1.44%
• YTD: 8.19%
• 6M: 6.74%
• 1Y: 21.97%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FMAY

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: -0.57%
• YTD: 4.02%
• 6M: 3.86%
• 1Y: 12.21%
• 3Y*: 13.16%
• 5Y*: 8.98%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TOV vs. FMAY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TOV JLens 500 Jewish Advocacy U.S. ETF	8.19%	14.91%
FMAY FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May	4.02%	11.17%

Correlation

The correlation between TOV and FMAY is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2025	0.93

The correlation between TOV and FMAY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

TOV vs. FMAY - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TOV	FMAY
Technology	39.4%	39.0%
Financial Services	11.1%	11.1%
Communication Services	10.9%	10.6%
Consumer Cyclical	9.6%	9.9%
Healthcare	8.4%	8.3%
Industrials	8.0%	7.8%
Consumer Defensive	4.4%	4.5%
Energy	3.2%	3.1%
Utilities	2.0%	2.1%
Real Estate	1.6%	1.8%
Basic Materials	1.5%	1.7%

Return for Risk

TOV vs. FMAY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TOV

TOV Risk / Return Rank: 61
TOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
TOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
TOV Omega Ratio Rank: 59
TOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
TOV Martin Ratio Rank: 67

FMAY

FMAY Risk / Return Rank: 72
FMAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
FMAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
FMAY Omega Ratio Rank: 76
FMAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
FMAY Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TOV vs. FMAY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JLens 500 Jewish Advocacy U.S. ETF (TOV) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May (FMAY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TOV	FMAY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.73	1.89	-0.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.40	2.70	-0.31
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.39	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.48	2.91	-0.43
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.61	15.45	-4.84

TOV vs. FMAY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TOV Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is comparable to the FMAY Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TOV and FMAY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TOV vs. FMAY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TOV drawdown since its inception was -16.97%, which is greater than FMAY's maximum drawdown of -13.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TOV and FMAY.

Drawdown Indicators

	TOV	FMAY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.97%	-13.60%	-3.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.89%	-4.22%	-4.67%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-13.12%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-13.60%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.39%	-1.67%	-1.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.20%	-2.00%	-0.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.08%	0.79%	+1.29%

Volatility

TOV vs. FMAY - Volatility Comparison

JLens 500 Jewish Advocacy U.S. ETF (TOV) has a higher volatility of 4.63% compared to FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May (FMAY) at 3.11%. This indicates that TOV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FMAY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TOV	FMAY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.63%	3.11%	+1.52%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.14%	5.41%	+4.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.78%	6.53%	+6.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.99%	10.66%	+7.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.99%	10.17%	+7.82%

TOV vs. FMAY - Expense Ratio Comparison

TOV has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than FMAY's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

TOV vs. FMAY - Dividend Comparison

TOV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, while FMAY has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
FMAY FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May	0.00%	0.00%
TOV JLens 500 Jewish Advocacy U.S. ETF	0.84%	0.76%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TOV and FMAY in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, TOV and FMAY move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, TOV or FMAY?

TOV has higher volatility (4.63%) compared to FMAY (3.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TOV dropped -16.97% vs FMAY's -13.60%.

Which ETF is better, TOV or FMAY?

On 1-year performance, TOV leads with 21.97% vs 12.21% for FMAY. On fees, TOV is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, FMAY has been the lower-risk option at 3.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TOV or FMAY?

Over the 1-year period, TOV has performed better with a 21.97% return vs 12.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TOV or FMAY?

TOV is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for FMAY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TOV or FMAY?

TOV has the higher dividend yield at 0.84%, compared with 0.00% for FMAY.

What is the main difference between TOV and FMAY?

TOV tracks JLens 500 Jewish Advocacy U.S. Index, while FMAY tracks Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index May Series. They also come from different issuers: JLens and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for TOV and 0.85% for FMAY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FMAY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.