PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TOTR vs. TGRT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TOTR vs. TGRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Total Return ETF (TOTR) and T. Rowe Price Growth ETF (TGRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TOTR achieves a 0.31% return, which is significantly lower than TGRT's 5.49% return.


TOTR

1D
-0.21%
1M
0.26%
YTD
0.31%
6M
0.27%
1Y
5.48%
3Y*
4.40%
5Y*
10Y*

TGRT

1D
-1.41%
1M
4.44%
YTD
5.49%
6M
5.18%
1Y
21.59%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TOTR vs. TGRT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
TOTR
T. Rowe Price Total Return ETF
0.31%7.41%2.43%2.88%
TGRT
T. Rowe Price Growth ETF
5.49%16.94%32.85%12.79%

Correlation

The correlation between TOTR and TGRT is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2023

0.16

TOTR vs. TGRT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TOTR
TGRT

Financial Services

67.7%
5.3%

Technology

17.1%
54.2%

Communication Services

4.9%
14.0%

Consumer Cyclical

4.7%
11.1%

Consumer Defensive

1.8%
1.5%

Healthcare

1.6%
8.0%

Industrials

1.2%
4.6%

Basic Materials

0.4%
0.4%

Utilities

0.4%
0.5%

Energy

0.2%
0.2%

Real Estate

0.1%

-

Financial Services

TOTR
67.7%
TGRT
5.3%

Technology

TOTR
17.1%
TGRT
54.2%

Communication Services

TOTR
4.9%
TGRT
14.0%

Consumer Cyclical

TOTR
4.7%
TGRT
11.1%

Consumer Defensive

TOTR
1.8%
TGRT
1.5%

Healthcare

TOTR
1.6%
TGRT
8.0%

Industrials

TOTR
1.2%
TGRT
4.6%

Basic Materials

TOTR
0.4%
TGRT
0.4%

Utilities

TOTR
0.4%
TGRT
0.5%

Energy

TOTR
0.2%
TGRT
0.2%

Real Estate

TOTR
0.1%
TGRT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TOTR vs. TGRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TOTR
TOTR Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
TOTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TOTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
TOTR Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
TOTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
TOTR Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

TGRT
TGRT Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
TGRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TGRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
TGRT Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
TGRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
TGRT Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TOTR vs. TGRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Total Return ETF (TOTR) and T. Rowe Price Growth ETF (TGRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TOTRTGRTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.24

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.15

1.21

+0.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.48

3.98

+2.49

TOTR vs. TGRT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TOTR Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is comparable to the TGRT Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TOTR and TGRT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TOTRTGRTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.26

1.35

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.04

1.21

-1.26

Drawdowns

TOTR vs. TGRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TOTR drawdown since its inception was -19.63%, smaller than the maximum TGRT drawdown of -22.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TOTR and TGRT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TOTRTGRTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.63%

-22.04%

+2.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.56%

-17.89%

+15.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.97%

-1.77%

-0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.00%

-3.27%

-5.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.85%

5.44%

-4.59%

Volatility

TOTR vs. TGRT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Total Return ETF (TOTR) is 1.25%, while T. Rowe Price Growth ETF (TGRT) has a volatility of 3.66%. This indicates that TOTR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TGRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TOTRTGRTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.25%

3.66%

-2.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.70%

12.51%

-9.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.37%

16.10%

-11.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.22%

19.09%

-12.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.22%

19.09%

-12.87%

TOTR vs. TGRT - Expense Ratio Comparison

TOTR has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is lower than TGRT's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

TOTR vs. TGRT - Dividend Comparison

TOTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.31%, more than TGRT's 0.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
TGRT
T. Rowe Price Growth ETF
0.07%0.08%0.09%0.06%0.00%0.00%
TOTR
T. Rowe Price Total Return ETF
5.31%5.14%5.32%4.71%3.45%0.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


TOTR and TGRT have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TGRT has higher volatility (3.66%) compared to TOTR (1.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TOTR dropped -19.63% vs TGRT's -22.04%.

On 1-year performance, TGRT leads with 21.59% vs 5.48% for TOTR. On fees, TOTR is cheaper at 0.31% per year. On volatility, TOTR has been the lower-risk option at 1.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TGRT has performed better with a 21.59% return vs 5.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TOTR is cheaper with a 0.31% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for TGRT.

TOTR has the higher dividend yield at 5.31%, compared with 0.07% for TGRT.

TOTR is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while TGRT is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.31% for TOTR and 0.38% for TGRT.

TGRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TOTR and TGRT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer