TOT vs. TFFI

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

TOT (LionShares U.S. Equity Total Return ETF) and TFFI (Chesapeake Trend-Following Fixed Income ETF) are both Actively Managed funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.21, they often move in opposite directions. TOT charges 0.07%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for TFFI.

Performance

TOT vs. TFFI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LionShares U.S. Equity Total Return ETF (TOT) and Chesapeake Trend-Following Fixed Income ETF (TFFI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

TOT

• 1D: -0.53%
• 1M: 0.24%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TFFI

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: 1.17%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TOT vs. TFFI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
TOT LionShares U.S. Equity Total Return ETF	0.63%
TFFI Chesapeake Trend-Following Fixed Income ETF	-0.08%

Correlation

The correlation between TOT and TFFI is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2026	-0.21

Return for Risk

TOT vs. TFFI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LionShares U.S. Equity Total Return ETF (TOT) and Chesapeake Trend-Following Fixed Income ETF (TFFI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

TOT vs. TFFI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TOT drawdown since its inception was -4.26%, roughly equal to the maximum TFFI drawdown of -4.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TOT and TFFI.

Drawdown Indicators

	TOT	TFFI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.26%	-4.23%	-0.03%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.84%	-1.83%	+0.99%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.33%	-1.66%	+0.33%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TOT	TFFI	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.52%	7.92%	+5.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.52%	7.92%	+5.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.52%	7.92%	+5.60%

TOT vs. TFFI - Expense Ratio Comparison

TOT has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than TFFI's 1.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

TOT vs. TFFI - Dividend Comparison

Neither TOT nor TFFI has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TOT and TFFI in my portfolio?

TOT and TFFI have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TOT or TFFI?

On fees, TOT is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TOT or TFFI?

TOT is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for TFFI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TOT or TFFI?

TOT and TFFI have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between TOT and TFFI?

They also come from different issuers: LionShares and Chesapeake. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for TOT and 1.01% for TFFI.