TOT vs. SASS
TOT (LionShares U.S. Equity Total Return ETF) and SASS (M.D. Sass Concentrated Value ETF) are both Actively Managed funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TOT charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for SASS.
Performance
TOT vs. SASS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TOT
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- 0.24%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SASS
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- -0.63%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TOT vs. SASS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TOT LionShares U.S. Equity Total Return ETF | 0.63% |
SASS M.D. Sass Concentrated Value ETF | 2.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between TOT and SASS is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2026 | 0.59 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TOT vs. SASS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LionShares U.S. Equity Total Return ETF (TOT) and M.D. Sass Concentrated Value ETF (SASS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TOT vs. SASS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TOT drawdown since its inception was -4.26%, smaller than the maximum SASS drawdown of -9.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TOT and SASS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TOT | SASS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.26% | -9.61% | +5.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.84% | -2.17% | +1.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.33% | -3.46% | +2.13% |
Volatility
TOT vs. SASS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TOT | SASS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.52% | 17.23% | -3.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.52% | 17.23% | -3.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.52% | 17.23% | -3.71% |
TOT vs. SASS - Expense Ratio Comparison
TOT has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than SASS's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
TOT vs. SASS - Dividend Comparison
Neither TOT nor SASS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
TOT and SASS have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TOT is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TOT is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for SASS.
TOT and SASS have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: LionShares and M.D. Sass. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for TOT and 0.75% for SASS.
Find the right allocation for TOT and SASS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer