TOS vs. AFOS
TOS (Twin Oak Strategic Solutions ETF) and AFOS (ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TOS charges 0.76%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for AFOS.
Performance
TOS vs. AFOS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TOS
- 1D
- -4.55%
- 1M
- -0.53%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AFOS
- 1D
- -4.70%
- 1M
- -0.24%
- YTD
- 26.02%
- 6M
- 29.35%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TOS vs. AFOS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TOS Twin Oak Strategic Solutions ETF | 14.23% |
AFOS ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF | 11.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between TOS and AFOS is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2026 | 0.87 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TOS vs. AFOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Twin Oak Strategic Solutions ETF (TOS) and ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TOS | AFOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.74 | 3.75 | -2.00 |
Drawdowns
TOS vs. AFOS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TOS drawdown since its inception was -11.72%, roughly equal to the maximum AFOS drawdown of -11.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TOS and AFOS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TOS | AFOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.72% | -11.52% | -0.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.20% | -4.83% | -0.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.57% | -1.38% | -1.19% |
Volatility
TOS vs. AFOS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TOS | AFOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.41% | 20.74% | +5.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.41% | 20.74% | +5.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.41% | 20.74% | +5.67% |
TOS vs. AFOS - Expense Ratio Comparison
TOS has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than AFOS's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
TOS vs. AFOS - Dividend Comparison
TOS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AFOS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
AFOS ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF | 0.24% | 0.30% |
TOS Twin Oak Strategic Solutions ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TOS and AFOS have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AFOS is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AFOS is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.76% for TOS.
AFOS has the higher dividend yield at 0.24%, compared with 0.00% for TOS.
They also come from different issuers: Twin Oak ETF Company and ARS Investment Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.76% for TOS and 0.45% for AFOS.
Find the right allocation for TOS and AFOS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer