PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TOS vs. AFOS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TOS vs. AFOS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Twin Oak Strategic Solutions ETF (TOS) and ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


TOS

1D
-4.55%
1M
-0.53%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AFOS

1D
-4.70%
1M
-0.24%
YTD
26.02%
6M
29.35%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TOS vs. AFOS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TOS and AFOS is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2026

0.87

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TOS vs. AFOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Twin Oak Strategic Solutions ETF (TOS) and ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TOS vs. AFOS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TOSAFOSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.74

3.75

-2.00

Drawdowns

TOS vs. AFOS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TOS drawdown since its inception was -11.72%, roughly equal to the maximum AFOS drawdown of -11.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TOS and AFOS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TOSAFOSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.72%

-11.52%

-0.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.20%

-4.83%

-0.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.57%

-1.38%

-1.19%

Volatility

TOS vs. AFOS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TOSAFOSDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.41%

20.74%

+5.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.41%

20.74%

+5.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.41%

20.74%

+5.67%

TOS vs. AFOS - Expense Ratio Comparison

TOS has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than AFOS's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

TOS vs. AFOS - Dividend Comparison

TOS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AFOS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%.


Frequently Asked Questions


TOS and AFOS have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AFOS is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AFOS is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.76% for TOS.

AFOS has the higher dividend yield at 0.24%, compared with 0.00% for TOS.

They also come from different issuers: Twin Oak ETF Company and ARS Investment Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.76% for TOS and 0.45% for AFOS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TOS and AFOS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer