TOPW vs. MSTZ
TOPW (Roundhill Top WeeklyPay ETF) and MSTZ (T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TOPW is a Derivative Income fund tracking the Solactive Roundhill WeeklyPay Universe Index, while MSTZ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by REX. TOPW is passively managed, while MSTZ is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.62, they often move in opposite directions. TOPW charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for MSTZ.
Performance
TOPW vs. MSTZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TOPW achieves a 2.32% return, which is significantly higher than MSTZ's -26.97% return.
TOPW
- 1D
- 1.15%
- 1M
- 3.06%
- 6M
- 0.75%
- YTD
- 2.32%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSTZ
- 1D
- -1.53%
- 1M
- 39.32%
- 6M
- -19.19%
- YTD
- -26.97%
- 1Y
- 264.10%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TOPW vs. MSTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TOPW Roundhill Top WeeklyPay ETF | 2.32% | -1.33% |
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF | -26.97% | 226.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between TOPW and MSTZ is -0.62, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2025 | -0.62 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TOPW vs. MSTZ — Risk / Return Rank
TOPW
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
MSTZ
TOPW vs. MSTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Top WeeklyPay ETF (TOPW) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TOPW | MSTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.30 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.86 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 5.59 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TOPW vs. MSTZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TOPW drawdown since its inception was -29.87%, smaller than the maximum MSTZ drawdown of -99.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TOPW and MSTZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TOPW | MSTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.87% | -99.38% | +69.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -84.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.52% | -97.51% | +82.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.29% | -94.53% | +81.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 43.41% | — |
Volatility
TOPW vs. MSTZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TOPW | MSTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 56.46% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 135.20% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.62% | 148.41% | -120.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.62% | 171.17% | -143.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.62% | 171.17% | -143.55% |
TOPW vs. MSTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
TOPW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than MSTZ's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
TOPW vs. MSTZ - Dividend Comparison
TOPW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 46.97%, while MSTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TOPW Roundhill Top WeeklyPay ETF | 46.97% | 21.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TOPW and MSTZ have a correlation of -0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TOPW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TOPW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for MSTZ.
TOPW has the higher dividend yield at 46.97%, compared with 0.00% for MSTZ.
TOPW is categorized as Derivative Income, while MSTZ is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill Investments and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for TOPW and 1.05% for MSTZ.
Find the right allocation for TOPW and MSTZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer